Re: UPDATE ON AMERICAN DISRESPECT BEGETS DISRESPECT

RHUBARB @ 0121 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Critique: "Some Republicans learned 
to 'name-drop' Derrida as an intellectual fashion for elites, and you 
can 'turn it back on them' using his work. This one continues with the 
'dunce' shit: really, 'auto-affection' is a modern idea Greek theories 
of the soul did not have in its complete form."

DOLF @ 0343 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Clearly you haven't read and 
understood the metalogic conundrum that was placed before you 
irrespective of whether metaphysics is an accepted science or not.

Given the notion COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; TDNT 1933, 
VOL I: 682-685] being a hypothetical “scene of origin” that then takes 
this TRIPARTITE rather than BIPARTITE mechanism as the epistemological 
basis for its anthropology.

Therein it introduces a postulate upon the thinking dynamic concept of 
#123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to #164 - DOMINION as impetus for 
#205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.

But you have criteria for impairment (mind flux) assaying:

#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14

The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an 
implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite 
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 - 
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such 
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as 
imposition [#17, #41, #65] upon autonomy.

As a hypothetical applicable to GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by 
continual exertion of force in total dominion as an extremely high 
acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which may be the result of adverse 
behavioural reinforcement.

On that physiological basis his guilt is mitigated (ie. the implicit 
adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is self evident 
since we stated it before the findings of institutional prejudices were 
made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against the police officer's 
#237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action).

Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be 
possible to test for #519: discernment (#68) in relation to the #495: 
seminal cause (#44) in exercising #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to 
#465: limits (#14) in use of #492: freewill (#41).

#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 % 
#41 = #13} 1) (Qal) enemy; 1a) personal; 1b) national;

#516 (-> #65) as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] /
#519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351): 
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;

As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION 
array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action.  A 
high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than 
instinctive action.

Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 - 
judgement sensibility / intellect, AM = #82 - terms of compliance: @491 
- principle of continuity) nevertheless able within a TRIPARTITE 
paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by syncretic 
progression DERRIDA's semantical construct which is a BIPARTITE 
encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with auto-affection: 
if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of the ‘I,’ even in 
the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must welcome within 
itself some irreducible hetero-affection."

Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 - 
judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as 
conformity to rule-based conventions:

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule 
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference 
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META 
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - JUPITER PRINCIPLE as aesthetic (ie. the 
hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (#41 
+ #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 - AGENCY 
that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not 
included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative 
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a 
CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to use the 
DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against 
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE 
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming 
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.

The #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our 
state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT / UPHOLD THE RIGHT.

You are the one with the education and yet lack academic integrity since 
dismissing any notion such as genocide without qualification (ie. its 
only selective criteria is self-importance as comforting repetition to a 
conforming worldview) is little different to defecation and social 
detriment by polution, whereas I am self educating and utilise available 
resources including Wikipedia to construct a syncretic progression (ie. 
If the language is eloquent and its ideas coherent then it has utility 
as function) as meta narrative to recursively elevate the process of 
thinking both within myself and others until it reaches its 
transcendence state:

#214 - NIRVANA (Greek: νιρβάνα)

[ν, {@1: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#50); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / 
WASTING: T'ANG (#50)}
ι, {@2: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#110 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%30}); 
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#60)}
ρ, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#189); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG 
(#79)}
β, {@4: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#270); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU 
(#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%0})}
α, {@5: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#271); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#82 - 
MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%11})}
ν, {@6: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#322); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / 
WASTING: T'ANG (#132)}
α] {@7: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#374); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#133)}

     #369 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, 
#10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
     #374 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023as [#5, #80, #70, #10, 
#8, #200, #1] /
     #389 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023as [#80, #70, #10, #5, 
#10, #200, #9, #5] /
     #395 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023as [#80, #70, #10, #5, 
#10, #200, #9, #1, #10] / 
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] = poiéō 
(G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of 
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the 
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, 
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one 
anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to 
appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one anything; 
1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something; 
1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors of a thing (to cause, bring 
about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1) to carry out, to 
execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one; 2c) with 
designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1) to 
make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration of the 
passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;

#133 as [#1, #30, #30, #1, #60, #1, #10] = allássō (G236): {UMBRA: #1262 
% #41 = #32} 1) to change, to exchange one thing for another, to transform;

TELOS TOTAL: #214 as [#200, #6, #8] = rûwach (H7308): {UMBRA: #214 % #41 
= #9} 1) spirit, wind; 1a) wind; 1b) spirit; 1b1) of man; 1b2) seat of 
the mind;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #273 as [#5, #60, #8, #200] = hexēs (G1836): 
{UMBRA: #273 % #41 = #27} 1) successively in order; 2) the next 
following, the next in succession;

#273 as [#4, #70, #20, #9, #40, #10, #70, #50] = dokímion (G1383): 
{UMBRA: #274 % #41 = #28} 1) the proving; 2) that by which something is 
tried or proved, a test;

Academia would consider such actions of appropriation as plagiarism but 
au contraire, whilst I might engage within wordplay by the placing of a 
sound bite into a different context which then besieges its integrity, 
it nevertheless grants me an immediate in situ access to the original work."

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>

Jeffrey Rubard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 7:59:27 PM UTC-7, dolf wrote:
>> 13 JUNE 2023 
>> 
>> 1) We have conveyed to OXFORD UNIVERSITY HISTORY FACULTY (ie. who 
>> produced the English language translation of the TABLE TALK) our 
>> conclusion that the REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK has a preferential 
>> KNOWLEDGE of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE / LUOSHU SQUARE REFERENCE OBJECT in 
>> being the likely foundational PREMISE for REICH CONCORDAT 1933 as 
>> MARRIAGE with #700 - CHI / RHO (ie. as AXIS MUNDI actions locally with 
>> #700 - SALE) SYMBOL and its DISSIDENCE as an inadequate "world as a 
>> wheel" definition within KITTEL'S VOL 1 TDNT upon the notion 
>> COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; VOL I: 682-685] 
>> 
>> CENTRE OF VALUE #123 = [#51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG), #1 - CENTRE (CHUNG), 
>> #71 - STOPPAGE (CHIH)] 
>> 
>> #38 #45 #40 
>> #43 #41 #39 
>> #42 #37 #44 
>> 
>> [JUXTAPOSITION 3x3 ANCHORS TO LUOSHU REFERENCE OBJECT AND HYPOTENUSE TO 
>> DOMINION ARRAY] 
>> 
>>  
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Chi-Rho%20-%20Course%20of%20Nature.jpeg> 
>> 

-- 

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
   <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic> 
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)