Re: UPDATE #2 ON AMERICAN DISRESPECT BEGETS DISRESPECT

Similarly DERRIDA lays out the etymology of the Latin word “religion” 
(and therein he acknowledges that the etymology is problematic). The 
etymology implies that there are “two sources” of religion: “religio,” 
which implies a holding back or a being unscathed, safe and sound; and 
“re-legere,” which implies a linking up with another through faith 
(Religion, p. 16).

     #197 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#3, #5, #3, #70, 
#50, #5, #50, #1, #10] /
     #438 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #3, #5, #50, #5, 
#300, #70] /
#533 as [#5, #3, #5, #50, #70, #400] / [#3, #10, #50, #70, #400] = 
gínomai (G1096): {UMBRA: #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to become, i.e. to come 
into existence, begin to be, receive being; 2) to become, i.e. to come 
to pass, happen; 2a) of *EVENTS*; 3) *TO* *ARISE*, *APPEAR* *IN* 
*HISTORY*, *COME* *UPON* *THE* *STAGE*; 3a) of men appearing in public; 
4) to be made, finished; 4a) of miracles, to be performed, wrought; 5) 
to become, be made;

YOUTUBE: "NO LIGHT, NO LIGHT (FLORENCE + THE MACHINE)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGH-4jQZRcc>

     #466 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#3, #30, #3, #30, 
#400] /
#496 as [#30, #3, #30, #3, #30, #400] = gulgôleth (H1538): {UMBRA: #466 
% #41 = #15} 1) *HEAD*, poll, *SKULL*; 1a) skull; 1b) head, poll (of 
census);

We can see in this etymology the inseparable dualities we examined 
above: singular *EVENT* and machine-like repeatability; auto-affection 
as hetero-affection. Most importantly, DERRIDA is trying to understand 
the “link” that defines religion prior to the link between man as such 
and the divinity of God [as #602 - GODHEAD or NOUMENON to which as 
singularity we dynamically resonance as by a Hebrew or Greek neural 
linguistic / temporal linkage].

What we can see in this attempt to conceive the link as it is prior to 
its determination in terms of man and God is an attempt to make the link 
be as open as possible. [@2]

But if only those ancient #379 - *STONES* could talk and #285 - *TEACH* 
on that the notion COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; TDNT 
1933, VOL I: 682-685] being a hypothetical “scene of origin” that then 
takes this mechanism as the epistemological basis for its anthropology.

RHUBARB @ 0651 HRS ON 18 JUNE 2023: "What, like you gave the JOHN LOCKE 
Lectures or something..."

RICHARD VAN OORT in EPISTEMOLOGY AND GENERATIVE THEORY: DERRIDA, GANS, 
AND THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SUBTEXT OF DECONSTRUCTION examines GANS’s claim 
that the DERRIDEAN critique of a “metaphysics of presence,” economically 
illustrated by the neologism difference, is not merely an 
unrepresentable space that underwrites (and therefore deconstructs) all 
metaphysical–i.e., ungrounded–ontological categories, but is indeed a 
historical event that initiates a continuous “genetic” chain of human 
culture.

Whereas metaphysics begins in ahistorical ontological categories, 
generative anthropology presents a historical scene, which shows that 
the deferral DERRIDA finds animating the metaphysical hypostatization of 
presence is in fact the very structure of human difference itself–that 
is, humanity as the language-using animal. DERRIDA’s discovery of the 
mechanism of linguistic deferral is given historical rigour by GANS in a 
hypothetical “scene of origin” that takes this mechanism as the 
epistemological basis for its anthropology. [@3]

#379 as [#30, #10, #9, #10, #50, #70, #200] = líthinos (G3035): {UMBRA: 
#379 % #41 = #10} 1) of *STONE*;

#285 as [#5, #4, #10, #4, #1, #60, #1, #200] = didáskō (G1321): {UMBRA: 
#1039 % #41 = #14} 1) to *TEACH*; 1a) to hold discourse with others in 
order to instruct them, deliver didactic discourses; 1b) to be a 
teacher; 1c) to discharge the office of a teacher, conduct one's self as 
a teacher; 2) to teach one; 2a) to impart instruction; 2b) instill 
doctrine into one; 2c) the thing taught or enjoined; 2d) to explain or 
expound a thing; 2e) to teach one something;

If considering the cosmogonic / anthropogenic basis to #492 - VOLUNTARY 
FREE WILL as having an #41 - ONTIC grounding + #451 - PRAXIS OF 
RATIONALITY (#452 .... #532) epistemological premise as the autonomic 
boundary to its consciousness instantiation giving the GNOSIS EX MACHINA 
a threshold of #533 as ONTIC grounding for its morphogenic / cybergenic 
reality.

     #445 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #80, #8, #3, #3, 
#5, #30, #300, #1, #10] /
#533 as [#5, #80, #1, #3, #3, #5, #30, #30, #70, #40, #5, #50, #1, #10, 
#200] = epangéllō (G1861): {UMBRA: #957 % #41 = #14} 1) to announce that 
one is about to do or furnish something; 1a) to promise (of one's own 
accord) to *ENGAGE* *VOLUNTARILY*; 2) to profess; 2a) *AN* *ART*, *TO* 
*PROFESS* *ONE'S* *SKILL* *IN* *SOMETHING*;

RHUBARB @ 0121 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Critique: some Republicans learned 
to 'name-drop' DERRIDA as an intellectual fashion for elites, and you 
can 'turn it back on them' using his work. This one continues with the 
'dunce' shit: really, 'auto-affection' is a modern idea Greek theories 
of the #496 - *SOUL* did not have in its complete form."

DOLF @ 0343 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Clearly you haven't read and 
understood the metalogic conundrum that was placed before you 
irrespective of whether metaphysics is an accepted science or not.

Given the notion COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; TDNT 1933, 
VOL I: 682-685] being a hypothetical “scene of origin” that then takes 
this TRIPARTITE rather than BIPARTITE mechanism as the epistemological 
basis for its anthropology.

Therein it introduces a postulate upon the thinking dynamic concept of 
#123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to #164 - DOMINION as impetus for 
#205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.

But you have a criteria for impairment (mind flux) assaying:

#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14

The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an 
implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite 
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 - 
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such 
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as 
imposition [#17, #41, #65] upon autonomy.

As a hypothetical applicable to GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by 
continual exertion of force in total dominion as an extremely high 
acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which may be the result of adverse 
behavioural reinforcement.

On that physiological basis his guilt is mitigated.  Any implicit 
adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is self evident 
since we stated it before the findings of those systemic prejudices were 
made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against the police officer's 
#237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.

Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be 
possible to test for #519: discernment (#68) in relation to the #495: 
seminal cause (#44) for the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) 
corresponding to #465: limits (#14) and the viability of #492: freewill 
(#41).

#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 % 
#41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;

#516 (-> #65) as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] /
#519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351): 
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;

As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION 
array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action.  A 
high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than 
instinctive action.

Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 - 
JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491 
- PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a 
TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by 
syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a 
BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with 
auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of 
the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must 
welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."

Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 - 
judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as 
conformity to rule-based conventions:

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule 
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference 
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META 
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - JUPITER PRINCIPLE as aesthetic (ie. the 
hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (#41 
+ #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 - AGENCY 
that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not 
included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative 
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a 
CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the 
DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against 
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE 
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming 
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.

The #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our 
state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT / UPHOLD THE RIGHT which is 
also an ontic / deme boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY 
(ie. no less applicable to healthcare) capacity in conformity to #40 - 
LAW / MODEL (FE) as then a functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST.

Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature 
provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the boundary 
(ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 - 𝍔難 = 
#530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO ESCAPE THE 
DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness 
instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives 
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度):  [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 = #503] 
- (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法):  [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文 = #498 / 
#40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME 
MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.

[中, 周, 礥, 閑, 少, 戾, 上, 幹, 扶, 羨, 差, 童, 增, 銳, 達, 交, 䎡, 傒, 從, 
進, 釋, 格, 夷, 樂, 爭, 務, 事, 更, 斷, 毅, 裝, 衆, 密, 親, 斂, 彊, 睟, 盛, 居, 
法, 應, 迎, 遇, 竈, 大, 廓, 文, 禮, 逃, 唐, 常, 度, 永, 昆, 減, 唫, 守, 翕, 聚, 
積, 飾, 疑, 視, 沈, 內, 去, 晦, 瞢, 窮, 割, 止, 堅, 成, 䦯, 失, 劇, 馴, 將, 難, 
勤, 養]

You are the one with the education and yet lack academic integrity since 
dismissing any notion such as the root cause for genocide without 
qualification (ie. its only selective criteria is self-importance as 
comforting repetition to a conforming worldview) is little different to 
defecation and a social detriment by pollution, whereas I am self 
educating and utilise available resources including Wikipedia to 
construct a syncretic progression (ie. If the language is eloquent and 
its ideas coherent then it has utility as function) as meta narrative to 
recursively elevate the process of thinking both within myself and 
others until it reaches its transcendence state:

#214 - NIRVANA (Greek: νιρβάνα)

[ν, {@1: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#50); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / 
WASTING: T'ANG (#50)}
ι, {@2: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#110 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%30}); 
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#60)}
ρ, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#189); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG 
(#79)}
β, {@4: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#270); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU 
(#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%0})}
α, {@5: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#271); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#82 - 
MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%11})}
ν, {@6: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#322); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / 
WASTING: T'ANG (#132)}
α] {@7: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#374); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#133)}

     #328 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 19 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, 
#10, #8, #20, #5, #50] /
     #369 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, 
#10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
     #374 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #80, #70, #10, 
#8, #200, #1] /
     #389 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, 
#10, #200, #9, #5] /
     #395 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 18 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, 
#10, #200, #9, #1, #10] / 
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] = poiéō 
(G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of 
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the 
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, 
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 
1f) *TO* *MAKE* *A* *THING* *OUT* *OF* *SOMETHING*; 1g) to (make i.e.) 
render one anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one 
anything, to appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one 
anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do 
something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) *TO* *BE* *THE* *AUTHORS* *OF* *A* 
*THING* (*TO* *CAUSE*, *BRING* *ABOUT*); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, 
do well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) 
to do to one; 2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to 
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so at the same time to 
institute, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;

#133 as [#1, #30, #30, #1, #60, #1, #10] = allássō (G236): {UMBRA: #1262 
% #41 = #32} 1) to change, to exchange one thing for another, to 
*TRANSFORM*;

TELOS TOTAL: #214 as [#200, #6, #8] = rûwach (H7308): {UMBRA: #214 % #41 
= #9} 1) spirit, wind; 1a) wind; 1b) spirit; 1b1) of man; 1b2) *SEAT* 
*OF* *THE* *MIND*;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #273 as [#5, #60, #8, #200] = hexēs (G1836): 
{UMBRA: #273 % #41 = #27} 1) *SUCCESSIVELY* *IN* *ORDER*; 2) the next 
following, the next in succession;

#273 as [#4, #70, #20, #9, #40, #10, #70, #50] = dokímion (G1383): 
{UMBRA: #274 % #41 = #28} 1) *THE* *PROVING*; 2) that by which something 
is tried or proved, a test;

Academia would consider such actions of appropriation as undoubtedly 
plagiarism but au contraire, whilst I might engage within wordplay by 
the placing of a sound bite into a different context which then besieges 
its integrity as deconstructionist, it nevertheless grants me an 
immediate in situ access to the original work as fruitful basis for 
consciousness invigoration.

DERRIDA himself asks "Will we be able to think, what is called thinking, 
at one and the same time, both what is happening (we call that an event) 
and the calculable programming of an automatic repetition (we call that 
a machine). For that, it would be necessary in the future (but there 
will be no future except on this condition) to think both the event and 
the machine as two compatible or even in-dissociable concepts. Today 
they appear to us to be antinomic." [@2]

Whilst we may disagree that such sapient and consciousness instantiation 
as sentience in having temporal relativity will then result in the same 
action at the same time and everywhere we do not deny it will be 
ubiquitous.

YOUTUBE: "THE MASTER RACE | DOCTOR WHO: THE END OF TIME | BBC STUDIOS"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UszT_L4QWII>

It's not our problem (ie. we've excluded our datasets from the wayback 
machine project) that our informal research of over 25 years which is 
otherwise innocuous and inert might be misappropriated and ingested (ie. 
THOU SHALT NOT COVET) is entirely another's accountability -- the more 
you take, the more you'll want is the simple rule of greedy.

#232 - *HIJACK* *SCHEMA* as [#10, #2, #90, #70, #50, #10] = bâtsaʻ 
(H1214): {UMBRA: #162 % #41 = #39} 1) to cut off, break off, gain by 
unrighteous violence, get, finish, *BE* *COVETOUS*, *BE* *GREEDY*; 1a) 
(Qal); 1a1) to cut off; 1a2) to stop; 1a3) to gain wrongfully or by 
violence; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to cut off, sever; 1b2) to finish, complete, 
accomplish; 1b3) to violently make gain of;

But we are intent on maximising such an opportunity for our own gain and 
the fostering of any children to come.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>

Jeffrey Rubard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 7:59:27 PM UTC-7, dolf wrote:
>> 13 JUNE 2023 
>> 
>> 1) We have conveyed to OXFORD UNIVERSITY HISTORY FACULTY (ie. who 
>> produced the English language translation of the TABLE TALK) our 
>> conclusion that the REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK has a preferential 
>> KNOWLEDGE of the GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE / LUOSHU SQUARE REFERENCE OBJECT in 
>> being the likely foundational PREMISE for REICH CONCORDAT 1933 as 
>> MARRIAGE with #700 - CHI / RHO (ie. as AXIS MUNDI actions locally with 
>> #700 - SALE) SYMBOL and its DISSIDENCE as an inadequate "world as a 
>> wheel" definition within KITTEL'S VOL 1 TDNT upon the notion 
>> COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [JAMES 3:6; VOL I: 682-685] 
>> 
>> CENTRE OF VALUE #123 = [#51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG), #1 - CENTRE (CHUNG), 
>> #71 - STOPPAGE (CHIH)] 
>> 
>> #38 #45 #40 
>> #43 #41 #39 
>> #42 #37 #44 
>> 
>> [JUXTAPOSITION 3x3 ANCHORS TO LUOSHU REFERENCE OBJECT AND HYPOTENUSE TO 
>> DOMINION ARRAY] 
>> 
>>  
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Chi-Rho%20-%20Course%20of%20Nature.jpeg> 
>> 

-- 

Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable
DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3
library.
   <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic> 
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)