Heavy Debate Over Claims of Vast Under-structures Beneath Pyramids

c186282 <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Mar 2025 02:09:29 -0400
Newsgroups talk.politics.misc,alt.history,alt.archeology,alt.science,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Message-ID <[email protected]>
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14539481/vast-city-exists-Giza-Pyramids-Egypt-new-discovery.html

. . .

   Ok, nut-shell : Team CLAIMS there are vast under-structures
   beneath the pyramids - going down maybe 4000 feet - that
   look like 'wells' or 'mines' with 'chambers' and 'staircases'.

   They used 'radar tomography' techniques - a sort of ground
   penetrating radar trick - to find this. Some comm satellites
   give off signals that CAN penetrate rather deeply. By using
   two or three, and building up the subsurface reflections
   over time, the team CLAIMS to see all this new stuff.

   First off, the result is VERY VERY low-rez. Limits of the
   tech alas. It's kinda so bad that you see more or less
   what you WANT to see.

   Next, the water table in the region has NEVER been below
   4000 feet for a million years or more. The pumping tech
   required to go that deep ... just unthinkable. With the
   Nile nearby ... wow ......

   COULD there have been kinda sophisticated pre-ice-age
   civs around there ? Of course - I kinda expect such -
   people are people and 'civ' just kinda pops up in all
   its glory once you get enough people in an area. But,
   based on artifacts, best to look in southern Turkey.

   On the flip - NO archeological artifacts ever found
   suggesting such a sophisticated Egyptian civ. It's
   a fairly good area for preserving such, but nothing
   except maybe a 20,000 year slow-growth in the region
   has left anything to see. 4000-foot wells/mines would
   require roughly 18th/19th-century techniques and THAT
   would leave LOTS of signs. Higher-tech doesn't just
   appear like magic, there's a long build-up and
   LOTS of 'junk' left around.

   SO, apologies, but I'm not gonna go with this groups
   analysis. IMHO, at best, we're looking at random
   underground rock formations, maybe with some caves
   and channels from long water seepage.

   STILL - interesting approach. The rez/accuracy CAN be
   improved for sure. Give it time. It's just amazing
   how LITTLE we know about pre-ice-age human civ - we
   likely know more about Mars. Stronger LOCAL multi-
   frequency transmitters can be employed, more time
   to build up the tomographic picture. Better yet, put
   down some small wells a mile or so from the site
   and use SOUND waves to build up a picture.