Note - Archeological Evidence Pointing More To Ice-Age Super-Civs
c186282 <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Apr 2025 01:55:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.misc,alt.history,alt.archeology,alt.science,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sophisticated mega constructions ... oft all that survive all those centuries ... keep getting re-dated earlier and earlier. Some, Sardinia esp, look to date into the middle of the ice age ... >12,000 years. Some pre-Incan structures seem to fit the same bill. Some TV idiots like to claim 'aliens' or 'god-like beings' were responsible. Kinda doubt it. The old structures are damned good, but not 'alien civ' sophisticated. Hey, humans are CLEVER - don't necessarily NEED 'aliens'. HOW some of these things were built, STILL a big mystery however ... it'd be super-difficult even with modern methods/machines. Maybe the oldest thing anyone wants to ADMIT to are the Gobekli Tepe 'temples' ... WAY better than Stonehenge. 10-12000 years old. Was NOT so long ago that humans were assumed to be near-animal idiots, incapable of such engineering/cooperation that long ago. For some reason we always want to de-rate The Ancients ... likely so WE can feel all superior now. Clearly some really funky stuff was happening during the last ice age. Alas a lot of it was probably coastal civs - now 300+ feet underwater. "High Tech" civs ... um ... no, not likely. High-tech leaves LOTS of signs, a huge garbage footprint, and so far we haven't seen those.