Re: Marjorie Taylor Greene "likes" the Mossad-did-it Theory

On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 9:09:38 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 11:41:52 PM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 4:13:52 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: 
> > > On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 7:04:04 AM UTC-6, John Corbett wrote: 
> > > > On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 10:03:08 PM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: 
> > > > > On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 7:24:39 PM UTC-6, John McAdams wrote: 
> > > > > > On 23 Feb 2021 18:03:47 -0000, "[email protected]" 
> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 8:51:16 PM UTC-6, John Corbett wrote: 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >> Nobody is defending wrongdoing. People are pointing out the hypocrisy of 
> > > > > > >> the left that describes left wing riots as mostly peaceful while 
> > > > > > >> describing right wing riots as insurrections. There's nothing false about 
> > > > > > >> that equivalency. Both have resulted in property damage and loss of life, 
> > > > > > >> but the left is only outraged at the atrocities committed by one side. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >There have been riots and unrest in this country based on outrage over 
> > > > > > >racial injustice 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Rioting is not a reasonable response to "racial injustice," even when 
> > > > > > there is real racial injustice -- which is way less often than the 
> > > > > > politically correct claim. 
> > > > > > .John 
> > > > > > ----------------------- http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I didn't say it was reasonable nor justified. I simply made the point that 
> > > > > that kind of unrest was historically far more common than the storming of 
> > > > > our capitol building. Well, the "capitol incident" (as it's called in the 
> > > > > conservative media) was actually a first. Starting fires in dumpsters, 
> > > > > breaking windows and taking looting - as bad as it is - is not even close 
> > > > > to being the same thing as storming the capitol with demands to get to 
> > > > > certain legislatures and stop a constitutional process for the sake of a 
> > > > > single individual who was letting go of power like a cat with its claws in 
> > > > > the carpet - and all based on what is rightfully being called "The Big 
> > > > > Lie." 
> > > > > 
> > > > Far more harm was done to this country by the riots of last summer than 
> > > > anything that was done on January 6. It is laughable for you to try to 
> > > > make the case that what happened in DC was far worse than last summer's 
> > > > uprising. There is no false equivalency. There is only double standards. 
> > > 
> > > You say that because the attack on the capitol failed. They did NOT stop 
> > > the constitutional process - only disrupted it. They did NOT get to the 
> > > legislators they were seeking to ... what? Hang them? Beat them? Kidnap 
> > > them? Torture them? But it wasn't for the want of trying. This was an 
> > > attack on our government, not Champ Sports, Best Buy or Dunkin' Donuts. 
> > As I said earlier, I don't hold Congress people in any higher regard than 
> > people who own businesses like Champ Sports, Best Buy, or Dunkin Donuts. I 
> > don't regard an attack on any of these to be more egregious that any 
> > others. On the other hand, since you do think an attack on Congress is 
> > more egregious than those on private businesses, was it any more egregious 
> > then the mob that threatened to breech the fence around the White House 
> > last summer. That one forced the Secret Service to take Trump to the White 
> > House shelter. That was Antifa and BLM at work. Are you going to claim 
> > that is a false equivalency too? Because if you do, you are an even bigger 
> > hypocrite than I thought. 
> > > 
> > > These dumbshits storm into the capitol, can't find whom their looking for 
> > > and ran out of ideas of what to do next. They broke windows, stole 
> > > podiums, name plates off doors, took selfies and took photographs of 
> > > documents that they didn't even understand. It reminds me of that scene in 
> > > the Will Ferrell movie "Old School", where Will Ferrell gets drunk and 
> > > wants to go group streaking. He leads the charge but then figures out that 
> > > nobody is following and runs out of ideas of what to do next. 
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgL95-90quM&t=0m31s 
> > Compared to the destruction wreaked during left wing protests last summer, 
> > the property damage was minimal. I'll bet if you tallied it all up, it 
> > wouldn't amount to 1% of the damage that was done in rioting last summer. 
> > > 
> > > The disparity in the POTENTIAL for harm cannot be compared. It's fortunate 
> > > that all our legislators were ushered out of there to safety. Imagine how 
> > > that would've played out had they stormed in more quickly while all were 
> > > present and in session. Like I said, we've had racially-motivated riots 
> > > before. The the capitol thing was something completely new and far more 
> > > dangerous to our democracy. It was, quite literally, an attack on 
> > > democracy. I think that's far worse. You obviously disagree. 
> > > 
> > You are being melodramatic. You are way overstating the danger that mob 
> > posed. Those in Congress were in no more danger than Trump was last 
> > summer. Both were ushered to safety as a precaution. The Capitol police 
> > had far more firepower than the rioters. Had they forced the issue, there 
> > would have been a lot more than just the one rioter shot dead. 
> > 
> > It really comes down to one thing. You are willing to excuse left wing 
> > rioters but not right wing rioters because you sympathize with the former.
> The double standard is really stark in this case.... 
> 
> https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2021/02/25/nyc-molotov-cocktail-lawyers-offered-plea-deal/ 
> 
> These two were filmed trying to pass out molotov cocktails to the crowd. 
> They were filmed throwing a molotov cocktail into a police vehicle. They 
> were filmed espousing violence. 
> 
> The FBI has a slam dunk case but is offering a plea deal (this is the 
> only time I can remember them not saying what the plea deal is). Why? 
> Because they are leftists all the most serious charges that the feds could 
> clearly easily win in court will be dropped. They will probably be allowed 
> to continue to practice law. 
> 
> She was born in Pakistan, he was born in Jamaica but they come here and 
> throw bombs.

If the bar association has any guts, they will disbar these two.