Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?

John Corbett <[email protected]> 17 Mar 2021 03:22:13 -0000
Newsgroups alt.assassination.jfk
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 7:11:23 PM UTC-4, BT George wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 1:16:06 PM UTC-5, John McAdams wrote: 
> > On 12 Mar 2021 13:06:48 -0000, John McAdams 
> > <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > 
> > >On 11 Mar 2021 04:15:51 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > > 
> > >>On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 2:48:31 AM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
> > >>> On 10 Mar 2021 22:21:40 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > >>> 
> > >>> > 
> > >>> What Trump has done is make the GOP clearly the party that opposed 
> > >>> arrogant elites. Like the tech giants that censor content they don't 
> > >>> like. 
> > >> 
> > >>What an embarrassing statement, John. Read up on things before you utter 
> > >>anything on this subject. Whether the elites are GOP or DNC I will leave 
> > >>out, both probably. But as far as Trump, for heavens sake *do you not 
> > >>understand* that the elites are his best friends? Those zero. point one 
> > >>percent who gained 90 percent of his tax cuts? Trump doesn't give a s**t 
> > >>about his "base. Right now his about to milk them of millions of dollars 
> > >>to a new fund. He's a grifter, John. Nothing else. 
> > >> 
> > >>Read up, John, You are out of touch. 
> > >> 
> > >>My God. John. What you are defending is going to end up on the ash heap of 
> > >>history. I would have never concluded this about you. This really isn't 
> > >>about votes, is it? 
> > >> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> I'm guessing you like Facebook and Twitter banning Trump. 
> > >> 
> > >>Here we go again with the ridiculous patronizing. Again, and again you do 
> > >>this, John. That's the really sad part of this discussion. I would have 
> > >>thought much better of you. The truth is that some of those you can't 
> > >>speak to in the JFK assassination, I can - and I do, they've all rejected 
> > >>you because of exactly what I've said here: learn, do not patronize people 
> > >>left and right, like you do. 
> > >> 
> > > 
> > >Answer the question! 
> > > 
> > >Do you approve of the Tech Giants banning Trump? 
> > > 
> > Simple question. 
> > 
> > Are you afraid to answer? 
> > 
> > .John 
> > ------------------------------- 
> > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
> Glenn, I would like to see a direct answer on this point. If you agree 
> with it, just own it, and explain why you think political censorship isn't 
> deadly dangerous to a liberal Democracy. If you don't agree with it, the 
> simply repudiate it. I think in a *fair* contest of ideas, the right 
> ideas will win in the end. And I would say that if the Left had a the 
> equivalent of a Trump that was being banned. 
> 

The left could never win in a fair contest of ideas. They need a biased 
media and the tech giants putting their thumb on the scale to make it a 
fair fight. It's kind of like a handicap in bowling or golf. It gives the 
weaker player reasonable chance to win.