Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?

On 20 Mar 2021 18:20:24 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:24:37 AM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote:
>> On 20 Mar 2021 00:04:22 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> 
>> >> > 
>> >> I've answered you. 
>> > 
>> >No, you haven't. Go look at my questions again. 
>> >
>> You didn't ask questions. You just bashed Republicans. 
>> 
>> Republicans want Voter ID. Democrats don't. 
>> 
>> Sweden has voter ID. 
>> 
>> Republicans want to ban mail-in voting. Democrats don't. 
>> 
>> Sweden does not allow mail-in voting. 
>> 
>> Republicans want to ban vote harvesting. Democrats don't. 
>> 
>> Sweden does not allow voter harvesting.
>> >> I've pointed out that the voting reforms 
>> >> Republicans want are THE SAME PROCEDURES IN PLACE IN SWEDEN. 
>> > 
>> >Again, quit making things up out of thin air. Republicans are nowhere near 
>> >wanting our system, as I've explained in detail. Do you understand this? 
>> >
>> You explained no such thing. 
>
>That's exactly what I've done. You selecting some things, cutting out 
>others displays only your dishonesty. Do you understand that this is 
>transparent and embarrassing on your part?
>

Do you understand that your going completely bonkers when I disagree
with you is transparent and embarrassing on your part?

You have talked about how great voting is in Sweden, IN SPITE OF THE
FACT THAT SWEDEN HAS THE SAME POLICIES REPUBLICANS WANT HERE.

>> 
>> You huffed and puffed about the evil Republicans, and then were 
>> embarrassed when I pointed how Sweden handles elections.
>
>Again, quit making things up and attribute your language to me. Do you 
>understand that this shows your dishonesty? I've never used the word 
>"evil". Your sinister and purposely false debate style is shameful.
>

You have indeed portrayed Republicans as evil, trying to "suppress"
the vote.

And you have bragged about how Republicans are headed for the dustbin
of history, for failure to be sufficiently politically correct.


>> >> >FYI, I have very clear opinions on the tech companies' actions. 
>> >> Then what are those opinions? 
>> >>
>> Still no answer. 
>
>You don't decide what I answer. Neither do you get to decide that I should 
>accept your change of subject. Do you understand this?
>

Yet another evasion.

The question is a simple one:  do you approve or disapprove of the
tech companies banning Donald Trump?

You direct hostile "questions" at me, and demand that I answer.

But you won't answer that very simple question.


>I'll give you one last chance. What motivates making it illegal in Georgia 
>to help feed voters in line? 

It's a form of bribery.

>How is reducing the number of polling 
>stations in certain districts motivated? Does this help eligible and 
>registered voters?
>

I would not know how it's motivated without knowing the specifics.

And you don't know either.

>Do you understand that those are important questions?
>
>> 

Not nearly as important as knowing whether you approve of the
censorship of Donald Trump.

Kindly give an honest answer.

.John
-------------------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm