Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?

On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:20:26 PM UTC-5, Glenn V. wrote:
> On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:24:37 AM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
> > On 20 Mar 2021 00:04:22 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > 
> > >On Friday, March 19, 2021 at 3:37:54 PM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
> > >> On 19 Mar 2021 01:50:53 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> So it was reasonable to ask, since you hate him so much, whether you 
> > >> want him censored. 
> > > 
> > >Don't make things up out of thin air. I don't hate Trump - do you 
> > >understand this? 
> > > 
> > See a post I'm about to put up. 
> > 
> > And do you think Twitter and Facebook should have banned him? 
> > >> 
> > >> You were the first one coming here and demanding answers. You didn't 
> > >> get the answers you wanted. 
> > >> >If you, too, think that I in any way whatsoever would be afraid to answer 
> > >> >any question from John or anyone else here, you are wrong. I agree what 
> > >> >was said somewhere above, the Gish Galloping is rampant in this thread. 
> > >> > 
> > >> If you are not afraid to answer the question, why don't you answer the 
> > >> question? 
> > >> >Did you see any answers from John so far, about what is behind one of the 
> > >> >bills in Georgia that would make it illegal to feed people in line to 
> > >> >vote, for example? An answer to this would be very much in line with the 
> > >> >topic of my first posting, which is very different from John's question. 
> > >> >It goes both ways, Brock. 
> > >> > 
> > >> I've answered you. 
> > > 
> > >No, you haven't. Go look at my questions again. 
> > > 
> > You didn't ask questions. You just bashed Republicans. 
> > 
> > Republicans want Voter ID. Democrats don't. 
> > 
> > Sweden has voter ID. 
> > 
> > Republicans want to ban mail-in voting. Democrats don't. 
> > 
> > Sweden does not allow mail-in voting. 
> > 
> > Republicans want to ban vote harvesting. Democrats don't. 
> > 
> > Sweden does not allow voter harvesting. 
> > >> I've pointed out that the voting reforms 
> > >> Republicans want are THE SAME PROCEDURES IN PLACE IN SWEDEN. 
> > > 
> > >Again, quit making things up out of thin air. Republicans are nowhere near 
> > >wanting our system, as I've explained in detail. Do you understand this? 
> > > 
> > You explained no such thing.
> That's exactly what I've done. You selecting some things, cutting out 
> others displays only your dishonesty. Do you understand that this is 
> transparent and embarrassing on your part?
> > 
> > You huffed and puffed about the evil Republicans, and then were 
> > embarrassed when I pointed how Sweden handles elections.
> Again, quit making things up and attribute your language to me. Do you 
> understand that this shows your dishonesty? I've never used the word 
> "evil". Your sinister and purposely false debate style is shameful.
> > >> >FYI, I have very clear opinions on the tech companies' actions. 
> > >> Then what are those opinions? 
> > >> 
> > Still no answer.
> You don't decide what I answer. Neither do you get to decide that I should 
> accept your change of subject. Do you understand this? 
> 
> I'll give you one last chance. What motivates making it illegal in Georgia 
> to help feed voters in line? How is reducing the number of polling 
> stations in certain districts motivated? Does this help eligible and 
> registered voters? 
> 
> Do you understand that those are important questions? 
> 

John I admittedly haven't followed every post in this thread, or even the 
details of the Georgia issue very much.  ...Though I would agree feeding 
voters in line might well prove a way of "manipulating" votes from the 
very poor and hungry, especially if the "feeders" would be able to 
identify or show support as Dems or Republicans.  But I cannot see much 
legitimate reason to reduce polling stations only in certain districts.  
So if you haven't answered Glenn then I would call on you to "own" head on 
your take of the motivation behind this.  If you answer that, then he will 
be in no place to refuse to directly confirm his position on banning Trump 
and other Conservatives.

Brock