Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?
"Glenn V." <[email protected]> 20 Mar 2021 22:26:53 -0000
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I absolutely agree with Brock. Fine, I've answered this one elsewhere, below. > > And Glenn seems to be unaware that our two major US parties have somewhat > "flipped" recently. I'll let Glenn research on his own, but IN GENERAL the > Democratic party is supported by upper income elites and the managerial > class, and the Republican party is IN GENERAL supported by small business > owners and the working class. Right. Well, I have researched this quite extensively over the years. I was perhaps a bit unclear, agreed. What I meant to say was that the "elites" as defined by most people in the US, are more the well educated class, upper income class, yes sure, but also those financial elites that have nothing whatsoever in common with the working classes, but some of which now have made the true working class in America, believe they do. The true fact is the opposite, all of the financial elites are actually doing whatever they can to hold back the working class. But that's different, and long story. Also, Trump has, in recent years, been the foremost and most successful voice to make this working class believe otherwise. His "working class support" is the single biggest charade, yes fraud if you will, that I've ever - ever - seen in US politics. Purported through mostly his racial stands, no doubt. That's where he knew he would get their support - and that he did, and still does, probably. > Today's liberals are the purveyors of the > bigoted beliefs based off of begged questions that comprises critical race > theory and today's liberals are absolutely fine with conservative speech > being banned and rigging elections by loosening the safeguards that > protect each vote. Critical race theory? Do you mind expand a little on this? > Glenn, those tax cuts you CLAIM go to the upper 1% > (I'll allow this claim to go unchallenged) would probably benefit > Democrats more than Republicans. Not a chance. Everything I know as a economist tells me otherwise. And the tax cuts, yes I did say that 90% got nothing, and that what the statistics show. > The myth of the Mr. Moneybags Monopoly > character with a monocle being a Republican is just that; a myth. > America's "Greedy One-Percenters" skew Democrat and oftentimes make a > six-figure income working for the government or in an industry that > benefits from being connected to government contracts and largesse. You should be a bit more careful than assuming that I am in some way giving the D's a free ride on every issue. I don't. > > There is something earth shattering going on in this country right now. > It's no hyperbole to say we are in a "Cold" Civil War. Republicans want > freedom, and Democrats want control. Let's hope the cold war doesn't turn > hot. In my, yes it is earth shattering. But the reason not those you refer to. The Republicans (as defined by the GOP) what are they, as of today. Platform, politics, etc. They are simply not recognizable - not even to quite a large chuck of ex-GOP's. Because of the racism, because of their questionable support for US democracy, as we've all witnessed lately. Instead we see complete no nothing imbeciles getting elected to Congress, very dangerous people who the GOP leaders don't dare touch, but instead goes down to Mar a Lago to get instructions. The GOP is in some sort of shambles and GOD only knows how that will end. > > So, Glenn, answer John's question please. Let's hear where you stand on > free speech. If we do not allow all political speech--whether you think it > dangerous or not--we're doomed. Are you okay with Big Tech censoring Trump > and other Republicans and other thoughts and ideas that Big Tech feels is > dangerous? We'll see about that.