Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?

On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 2:20:26 PM UTC-4, Glenn V. wrote:
> On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:24:37 AM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
> > On 20 Mar 2021 00:04:22 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > 
> > >On Friday, March 19, 2021 at 3:37:54 PM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
> > >> On 19 Mar 2021 01:50:53 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> So it was reasonable to ask, since you hate him so much, whether you 
> > >> want him censored. 
> > > 
> > >Don't make things up out of thin air. I don't hate Trump - do you 
> > >understand this? 
> > > 
> > See a post I'm about to put up. 
> > 
> > And do you think Twitter and Facebook should have banned him? 
> > >> 
> > >> You were the first one coming here and demanding answers. You didn't 
> > >> get the answers you wanted. 
> > >> >If you, too, think that I in any way whatsoever would be afraid to answer 
> > >> >any question from John or anyone else here, you are wrong. I agree what 
> > >> >was said somewhere above, the Gish Galloping is rampant in this thread. 
> > >> > 
> > >> If you are not afraid to answer the question, why don't you answer the 
> > >> question? 
> > >> >Did you see any answers from John so far, about what is behind one of the 
> > >> >bills in Georgia that would make it illegal to feed people in line to 
> > >> >vote, for example? An answer to this would be very much in line with the 
> > >> >topic of my first posting, which is very different from John's question. 
> > >> >It goes both ways, Brock. 
> > >> > 
> > >> I've answered you. 
> > > 
> > >No, you haven't. Go look at my questions again. 
> > > 
> > You didn't ask questions. You just bashed Republicans. 
> > 
> > Republicans want Voter ID. Democrats don't. 
> > 
> > Sweden has voter ID. 
> > 
> > Republicans want to ban mail-in voting. Democrats don't. 
> > 
> > Sweden does not allow mail-in voting. 
> > 
> > Republicans want to ban vote harvesting. Democrats don't. 
> > 
> > Sweden does not allow voter harvesting. 
> > >> I've pointed out that the voting reforms 
> > >> Republicans want are THE SAME PROCEDURES IN PLACE IN SWEDEN. 
> > > 
> > >Again, quit making things up out of thin air. Republicans are nowhere near 
> > >wanting our system, as I've explained in detail. Do you understand this? 
> > > 
> > You explained no such thing.
> That's exactly what I've done. You selecting some things, cutting out 
> others displays only your dishonesty. Do you understand that this is 
> transparent and embarrassing on your part?
> > 
> > You huffed and puffed about the evil Republicans, and then were 
> > embarrassed when I pointed how Sweden handles elections.
> Again, quit making things up and attribute your language to me. Do you 
> understand that this shows your dishonesty? I've never used the word 
> "evil". Your sinister and purposely false debate style is shameful.
> > >> >FYI, I have very clear opinions on the tech companies' actions. 
> > >> Then what are those opinions? 
> > >> 
> > Still no answer.
> You don't decide what I answer. Neither do you get to decide that I should 
> accept your change of subject. Do you understand this? 
> 
> I'll give you one last chance. What motivates making it illegal in Georgia 
> to help feed voters in line?

  What does eating have to do with voting?

  Since food cost money you are giving people compensation for voting.

> How is reducing the number of polling 
> stations in certain districts motivated? Does this help eligible and 
> registered voters? 

  You haven`t shown it hurts them.
 
> Do you understand that those are important questions? 
> 
> > 
> > .John 
> > ------------------------------- 
> > http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm