Re: Did the Davises see anyone (other than Mrs. Markham)?
Bud <[email protected]> 12 Apr 2021 00:38:09 -0000
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday, April 11, 2021 at 9:49:47 AM UTC-4, donald willis wrote: > On Friday, April 9, 2021 at 5:31:05 PM UTC-7, Bud wrote:=20 > > On Friday, April 9, 2021 at 6:13:22 PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:=20 > > > On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 6:11:28 PM UTC-7, Bud wrote:=20 > > > > On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 3:26:16 PM UTC-4, donald willis wrot= e:=20 > > > > > On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 8:03:11 PM UTC-7, Bud wrote:=20 > > > > > > On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 3:40:29 PM UTC-4, donald willis wr= ote:=20 > > > > > > > On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 5:14:15 PM UTC-7, John Corbett wr= ote:=20 > > > > > > > > On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 3:47:27 PM UTC-4, CUT=20 > > > > > > > > > Try again. You start with a false, or at best half-true, = premise:=20 > > > > > > > > > "Oswald dumped the shells in the bushes". Well, one shell= , supposedly.=20 > > > > > > > > > Quarter-true. And Benavides says another "by the bush". B= ut the Davises=20 > > > > > > > > > testified that the two shells that THEY found were on the= side yard, under=20 > > > > > > > > > a window and near the side walkway. NOT in or near those = bushes. And you=20 > > > > > > > > > accuse ME of cherry picking!=20 > > > > > > > > Now you are just nitpicking because you have nothing of sub= stance to=20 > > > > > > > > present. The important thing is that Oswald was seen dumpin= g shells from=20 > > > > > > > > his revolver=20 > > > > > > > Like I said, LNs find it very hard to admit when they're wron= g, as Corbett=20 > > > > > > > here was with his Oswald dumped all the shells in the bushes.= If he can't=20 > > > > > > > get the details right, it makes you wonder about his Big Pict= ure....=20 > > > > > > The big picture is the shells being found in that area makes it= =20 > > > > > > impossible that an automatic was used to kill Tippit.=20 > > > > > "That area"? What area?=20 > > > > That corner of the house.=20 > > > >=20 > > > > That is why it is easy to determine a revolver and not an automatic= was=20 > > > > used. Has an automatic been used the shells would have been found 4= 0-50=20 > > > > feet away towards the front of Tippit`s patrol car.=20 > > > > >We were talking about shells the Davises found=20 > > > > > around the bushes.=20 > > > > Yes, the bushes are at that corner of the house. The bushes Scoggin= s saw=20 > > > > Oswald come through.=20 > > > > > Or Corbett's 3/4 false "Oswald dumped the shells in the=20 > > > > > bushes".=20 > > > > That vicinity.=20 > > > The side of the house under the window & the grass near the side walk= way=20 > > > are NOT in the vicinity of the bushes.=20 > > When Barbara Davis was asked where she saw Oswald emptying the gun, she= =20 > > said not quite to the bushes. > That's not quite what she said.=20 It is exactly what she said. "Mr. BALL. In other words, there is a cross you make across the line that he took which marks the place where he was emptying the gun. Mrs. DAVIS. Just about halfway there. Mr. BALL. Mark it also on 21, 534. Mrs. DAVIS. Not quite half, not quite to the bushes there." "...not quite to the bushes there" >That was more counsel Ball than Barbara=20 > D.:=20 Stop making things up. =20 > Ball: "Did you later look in the bushes & find something??=20 > Davis: "Yes, IN THE GRASS BESIDE THE HOUSE."=20 That area is the side of the house. =20 > Note that, although she said, Yes, she did not even use the word "bushes"= .=20 She had earlier. The bushes, the window and the grass beside the house are all the same small area in that corner of the house. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=3D11029#relPageId=3D34 It is where she saw Oswald cut across the lawn while removing the spent shells from his handgun. The reason he shells were empty is because the slugs were in Tippit`s body. Perhaps if you spend a few more decades studying this case you might be able to figure out the simple basic facts about what occurred. I`m not optimistic, either in the time span or the capability. > Trust more in her "under the window", which window was not near the=20 > bushes.=20 She marked which window in the photo. It is the one that overlooks the bushes. > dcw