Re: WHO KILLED GEORGE FLOYD?
John Corbett <[email protected]> 14 Apr 2021 21:16:58 -0000
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 9:31:09 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > https://centaurfilmworks.com/ I thought about starting a new thread with this post but since John McAdams has been giving us a lot of leeway recently with off topic posts, I decided not to press it. Instead I am posting in a somewhat related thread. The following is a New York Times story about the officer charged in the Brooklyn Park shooting of a young black man: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kim-potter-will-be-charged-with-manslaughter-in-daunte-wright-killing/ar-BB1fExNi?ocid=msedgdhp This was the first sentence in the article: "The white Minnesota police officer who fatally shot Daunte Wright, a 20-year- old Black man, after appearing to mistake her handgun for her Taser will be charged with second-degree manslaughter, a prosecutor said on Wednesday, following three nights of protests over the killing.". It is the little things that speak volumes to me. In this case, the NYT has chosen to capitalize Black but not white. Why would that be? If this was a one time occurrence it would be easy to dismiss this as a simple typo but this is the third story by a leftist news source in the past week that has done this same thing. What is the reason for the doing this? Is this a subtle endorsement of black supremacy? Another curious thing about this is that for the past few decades the politically correct term for black people has been African-American. Why the sudden change to Black? Are we supposed to believe that three different news sources independently made the same editorial decision at the same time and that they all decided that Black should be capitalized. Clearly these so-called news organizations are acting in concert, i.e. collusion. There is no way this could be a coincidence. Lastly, why did the NYT choose to identify the race of both the shooter and the victim. It could be argued that it is pertinent to the story but would they make the same decision if the cop had been black and the victim had been white? An even better question would be if they would have reported the story at all. These are questions that almost answer themselves.