"Is the incidence of COVID-19 vaccine blood clot problems any higher than with other immunizations?"
Rudy Canoza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
AI Overview
No, the overall incidence of standard blood clot problems following COVID-19
vaccination is not significantly higher than with other routine immunizations,
though a specific, ultra-rare type of clotting syndrome was uniquely tied to
older adenoviral-vector formulas.
Large-scale comparative studies, such as research published in Blood and
monitored by Thrombosis Canada, demonstrate that after adjusting for underlying
health risks, the rate of standard blood clots (like deep vein thrombosis or
pulmonary embolisms) is statistically identical between people receiving mRNA
COVID-19 vaccines and those receiving annual influenza shots.
Statistical Comparison of Clotting Risks
While standard risks are stable across platforms, specific vaccine types vary in
rare adverse event profiles:
_Vaccine Type / Status_ _Risk of Clotting Events_ _Context & Key Distinctions_
Rates track perfectly
mRNA Vaccines (Pfizer / No elevated risk with baseline populations
Moderna) and standard flu shots.
Adenoviral Vaccines
(J&J / AstraZeneca) ~2 to 10 per million Linked to a unique,
doses highly specific immune
condition called VITT.
Active COVID-19 Infection Up to 140,000 per The virus itself creates
million (14%) massive inflammation and
a severe clotting threat.
There is *zero* evidence of an elevated blood clotting risk from the COVID-19
vaccines. AlleyPussyBitch and all the rest of the knuckle-dragging right-wingnut
shitbags are lying. They *always* lie. It's what fascists do.