Re: Voter ID Is racist But ID Requirement For Mamdani's Grocery Store is Not?
Allahu Snackbar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <YQodS.8007$W%[email protected]> |
On 8/7/2026 10:21 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <[email protected]>, > [email protected] says... >> >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 13:11:55 -0400, Nosmo King <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8/6/26 12:56 PM, Governor Swill wrote: >>>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:21:59 -0400, Nosmo King wrote: >>>>> On 8/5/26 10:31 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> Nosmo King wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed): >>>>>>> On 8/5/26 7:35 AM, Governor Swill wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:29:46 -0400, Nosmo King wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/4/26 1:02 AM, Governor Swill wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 23:03:50 -0000 (UTC), pothead >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-03, Lissajous <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Please explain. >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/nyc-mayor-zohran-mamdani- >>>>>>>>>>>> confirms-203818508.html> >>>>>>>>>>> Voter ID is an 80/20, some say 90/10 issue, across party lines, so it's intriguing as to why the >>>>>>>>>>> democrats and a handful of republicans are opposed to it. >>>>>>>>>> I don't know where you got your numbers from but I can smell the >>>>>>>>>> bullshit from here. >>>>>>>>> Nah, that's just your breath. >>>>>>>> Doesn't change the fact that poohead's numbers are made up bullshit. >>>>>>> Pew Research Center: 83% of U.S. adults favor requiring all voters to >>>>>>> show government-issued photo identification to vote, compared to 16% >>>>>>> opposed. >>>>>>> Gallup: 84% support requiring photo identification at the voting place. >>>>>>> Monmouth University: 80% support requiring photo ID to cast a ballot, >>>>>>> with 18% opposed. >>>>>> Well, everytime I have voted in various states, I had to show ID. >>>>>> What you're doing is conflating ID to vote versus ID to *register* >>>>>> to vote. >>>> >>>>> No, I posted polling results about "ID to vote" whereas you are the one >>>>> conflating it with *registration*. >>>> >>>> You "posted" something you wrote up. You have yet to substantiate >>>> those numbers. >>> >>> Already posted. I'm not multi-posting the same things because you're too >>> stupid to find it. >> >> Boo fucking hoo. You hadn't posted them when I wrote the above but >> you have posted them since. Found it, already discussing it but am >> disappointed that you're twisting and spinning irrelevancies instead >> of holding honest discussions. > > Says the twit that never posts proof He supplies proof. You supply nothing but bullshit. "oh the irony" [you don't know what 'irony' is] "Still firing blanks?" "More liberal tears." "Yea and?" "Where?" "Nice spin." "I made you do this again." "Yea sure, LOL" "Prove it." "so?" "so what?" "who cares?" "bring it bitch" "TINW" "you poor thing" "why do you care" "were you there" "Who said that? Oh YOU did." "You keep thinking that." "Look what I made you do." "Who says?" Zero meaning in anything you post.