Re: Voter ID Is racist But ID Requirement For Mamdani's Grocery Store is Not?

On 8/7/2026 10:19 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted 
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch 
of lies:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
>>
>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 12:00:56 -0400, Nosmo King <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/6/26 11:38 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 14:28:44 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
>>>>> On 8/5/2026 2:24 PM, Nosmo King wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/5/26 11:35 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/5/2026 10:28 AM, Nosmo King wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/5/26 10:08 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/5/2026 9:17 AM, Nosmo King wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/5/26 7:35 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:29:46 -0400, Nosmo King wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/4/26 1:02 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 23:03:50 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Voter ID is an 80/20, some say 90/10 issue, across party lines,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it's intriguing as to why the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> democrats and a handful of republicans are opposed to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know where you got your numbers from but I can smell the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit from here.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nah, that's just your breath.
>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't change the fact that poohead's numbers are made up bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>> Pew Research Center: 83% of U.S. adults favor requiring all voters
>>>>>>>>>> to show government-issued photo identification to vote, compared to
>>>>>>>>>> 16% opposed.
>>>>>>>>>> Gallup: 84% support requiring photo identification at the voting
>>>>>>>>>> place.
>>>>>>>>>> Monmouth University: 80% support requiring photo ID to cast a
>>>>>>>>>> ballot, with 18% opposed.
>>>>>>>>> Evidence?
>>>>>>>> Pew, Gallup and Monmouth. Did you even read the post?
>>>>>>> I read the words, I didn't see the evidence.
>>>>>> Pew, Gallup, Monmouth. That's the evidence.
>>>>
>>>>> But you don't provide the links?
>>>>
>>>> ... despite having had four opportunities to do so.  Will he take the
>>>> fifth?  ;))
>>>
>>> Take the fifth...what, you think I'm Dr. Fauci?
>>>
>>> Pew:
>>> https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/08/22/majority-of-americans-continue-to-back-expanded-early-voting-voting-by-mail-voter-id/
>>>
>>> Gallup:
>>> https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx
>>>
>>> https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_062121/
>>> (older, but confirmed by the above).
>>>
>>> Here are more:
>>
>> And it only too three days of shaming you to get you to do the
>> responsible, adult thing and provide us with the sources for the
>> numbers you mentioned.
>>
>>> CBS News/YouGov (multiple recent surveys, e.g., March 2026 and July
>>> 2026): Around 77?80% favored requiring valid photo ID to vote (20?23%
>>> opposed). https://www.cbsnews.com/news/voting-process-photo-id-opinion-poll/
>>>
>>> Fox News Poll (July 2026): 77% of registered voters favored requiring
>>> photo identification to cast a ballot, and 83% favored it for
>>> registering to vote. Support has stayed consistently in the 77?85% range
>>> in Fox polling for years.
>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-significant-support-both-voter-id-laws-mail-in-ballots.
>>> Yeah I know...but but but Fox.
>>>
>>> Reuters/Ipsos (April 2026) 77% support voter ID laws.
>>> Slightly below the 80% threshold, but still demonstrates broad
>>> bipartisan support.
>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/trumps-election-fraud-claims-spread-distrust-before-midterms-reutersipsos-poll-2026-04-23/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
>>>
>>> You may now begin with the "yeah, buts...."
>>>
>>
>> These numbers are perfectly acceptable but you would have saved page
>> after page of useless flaming over the past three days if you had just
>> posted these in the first place instead of arguing that you shouldn't
>> have to.  Then some discussion could have happened.
> 
> "flaming"? You don't know flaming. What you do is sissy boy shit.

That's funny, coming from a self-crippled fake tuff-boi who hasn't been in a 
fight since third grade, and lost all the fights up to then.