Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Alan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-23 15:13, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-22 15:10, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-08-22 13:56, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-08-22 07:53, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:55, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:27, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:53:22 -0600, Skeeter >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debate. They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it absolutely is not. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No one knows the origin of life - yet. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's all theories. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But the scientific theories are backed up by observed facts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So someone watched the big bang? Did someone actually the first form of life? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But why do you think those are the only facts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who said that was all I thought? Oh you did. You can't point out anything that >>>>>>> shows where it all came from. ll you can do is argue. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I can't point out lots of facts that support the best theories about the >>>>>> age and nature of the universe... >>>>> >>>>> Then go sit down. >>>>>> >>>>>> ...and all you can point out are a lot of myths in a book which is >>>>>> obviously wrong about so much. >>>>> >>>>> I point out both sides. You choose to nit pick for the sake of an argument. >>>>> There are theories and there are myths. I never said if there was a God or not. >>>>> I said if there was then creation makes sense. Now tell me about entropy. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Name one thing you've pointed out about the other side of this debate.. >>>> >>>> ONE THING. >>> >>> Go back and read. I never claimed either. I just pointed out the differences >>> and why "if" there was a God then it makes sense. So far it makes more sense >>> than a big bang. Now spin this one around. >>> >> >> Nope. "If" there's a god it just asks the next logical question: where >> did it come from? > > Who decides that? If there is a God those questions wouldn't matter. > Your entire argument boils down to: "I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so there must be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he came to be...because he's a god and that's different." It certainly spares you any need to think.