Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

On 2026-08-23 15:14, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>
>> On 2026-08-22 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-08-22 13:59, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 08:07, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:55:13 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:27, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:53:22 -0600, Skeeter
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debate. They know that....,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it absolutely is not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No one knows the origin of life - yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's all theories.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But the scientific theories are backed up by observed facts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So someone watched the big bang? Did someone actually the first form of life?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Those are theories, subject to change with new data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All theories, no facts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lots of facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, Tell me how it all started and prove it with facts.
>>>>
>>>> Again, you want ALL the answers and if I can't provide all the answers
>>>> you'll deny every fact.
>>>
>>> What facts? You haven't posted any. I have. Matter cannot be eternal. That IS
>>> science. Now show me fact on how it all came about. You can't so you want to
>>> twist what I say. You are a bad troll.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You just want to ignore them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I pay attention to all of it. Science is man made so the results are also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this, how are you any different than a flat-earther?
>>>>>
>>>>> And he changes it again. The earth was proven round a long time ago. No facts
>>>>> needed. No one has proven how everything came about. That's why I keep an open
>>>>> mind. No one has the right to tell another person there is no God when they
>>>>> don't even know themselves.
>>>> Actually the Earth was proven round WITH FACTS.
>>>
>>> I never said it wasn't.
>> Do you not even remember what you type a single day later?
>>
>> "The earth was proven round a long time ago. No facts needed."
> 
> So? Semantics again. You're playing word twisting again.

Nope. You literally said that "No facts" were "needed" to prove the 
Earth was round.

No semantics in that.