Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

Alan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-08-23 15:19, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>
>> On 2026-08-22 15:51, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-08-22 14:02, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-08-22 11:05, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 4:26 AM, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They know that....,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note? [sic]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes ? *noted*, not "note."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
>>>>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
>>>>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
>>>>>>>>> whatever they are told.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget of stupid
>>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you always drank
>>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you can't prove your religious bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not being religious. You are trying to make it look that way spin boy.
>>>>>
>>>>> The point is you can prove me wrong even if I was a firm believer.
>>>> I don't have to prove you wrong, Cupcake.
>>>
>>> If I had the answers then so would you. You idiot.
>>>>
>>>> But you explicitly said the universe was created by a god.
>>>
>>> No I didn't. I said "if" there was a God. That would answer a lot of questions
>>> and no theories.
>>>>
>>>> That requires belief that such a god exists.
>>>
>>> You have taken the whole conversation and twisted it to suit you. As usual. If
>>> there is a God thing would make more sense. "IF" there was. I never said I knew
>>> for sure there was. If fact I don't know and neither do you. You don't know how
>>> to have a discussion without turning it into an argument.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It would only "make more sense" if you ignore the obvious question:
>>
>> If a god explains the existence of the universe, then what explains the
>> existence of a god?
> 
> That would be for him/her to decide.
> 
> 
> 

Look, your entire argument boils down to:

"I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so 
there must be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he 
came to be...because he's a god and that's different."

It certainly spares you any need to think.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.