Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Alan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-23 15:19, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-22 15:51, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-08-22 14:02, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-08-22 11:05, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 4:26 AM, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no debate. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note? [sic] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes ? *noted*, not "note." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law >>>>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that >>>>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept >>>>>>>>> whatever they are told. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget of stupid >>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you always drank >>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And you can't prove your religious bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not being religious. You are trying to make it look that way spin boy. >>>>> >>>>> The point is you can prove me wrong even if I was a firm believer. >>>> I don't have to prove you wrong, Cupcake. >>> >>> If I had the answers then so would you. You idiot. >>>> >>>> But you explicitly said the universe was created by a god. >>> >>> No I didn't. I said "if" there was a God. That would answer a lot of questions >>> and no theories. >>>> >>>> That requires belief that such a god exists. >>> >>> You have taken the whole conversation and twisted it to suit you. As usual. If >>> there is a God thing would make more sense. "IF" there was. I never said I knew >>> for sure there was. If fact I don't know and neither do you. You don't know how >>> to have a discussion without turning it into an argument. >>> >>> >>> >> >> It would only "make more sense" if you ignore the obvious question: >> >> If a god explains the existence of the universe, then what explains the >> existence of a god? > > That would be for him/her to decide. > > > Look, your entire argument boils down to: "I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so there must be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he came to be...because he's a god and that's different." It certainly spares you any need to think.