Re: OT: B5 reboot?

On 09/10/2021 09:46, Daniel65 wrote:
> FP wrote on 8/10/21 9:55 am:
>> On 02/10/2021 10:33, Daniel65 wrote:
>>> Steveski wrote on 2/10/21 1:53 am:
>>>> On 01/10/2021 10:44, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>> Steveski wrote on 30/9/21 8:33 pm:
>>>>>> On 30/09/2021 09:12, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>> Steveski wrote on 30/9/21 10:15 am:
>>>>>>>> On 29/09/2021 23:55, FP wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 20:15, Kim Wall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> <https://deadline.com/2021/09/babylon-5-series-reboot-j-michael-straczynski-development-cw-1234845022/> 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean that the cast would all have to be about 12?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fantastic! Something on-topic to talk about?! I may have to 
>>>>>>>>> start watching television again.
>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's made me think - it shouldn't OT because it's ON topic . . .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'OT' can mean 'On Topic' can't it?? ;-P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes but, by long tradition, not for this froup.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeap, I knew as much, hence my Smiley!! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Oops - sense of irony failure on my part.
>>>>
>>> Don't you worry about it, Steveski. I'm well aware that a lot of 
>>> people don't 'get' my sense of humour! ;-P
>>
>> IIRC Daniel is simply correct.
>>
>> OT usually meant "off-topic" for most groups, but because everyone was 
>> talking about everything *but* B5, it is usually used to indicate "On 
>> topic" here.
>>
>> Frank
> 
> Yes, it's a bit unfortunate that the one term,. 'OT', can mean either of 
> two diametrically opposite things!

Never mind, *we* know what you mean.
-- 
Frank