Re: OT: B5 reboot?

FP wrote on 9/10/21 8:14 pm:
> On 09/10/2021 09:46, Daniel65 wrote:
>> FP wrote on 8/10/21 9:55 am:
>>> On 02/10/2021 10:33, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> Steveski wrote on 2/10/21 1:53 am:
>>>>> On 01/10/2021 10:44, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>> Steveski wrote on 30/9/21 8:33 pm:
>>>>>>> On 30/09/2021 09:12, Daniel65 wrote:
>>>>>>>> Steveski wrote on 30/9/21 10:15 am:
>>>>>>>>> On 29/09/2021 23:55, FP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 27/09/2021 20:15, Kim Wall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://deadline.com/2021/09/babylon-5-series-reboot-j-michael-straczynski-development-cw-1234845022/> 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does this mean that the cast would all have to be about 12?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fantastic! Something on-topic to talk about?! I may have to 
>>>>>>>>>> start watching television again.
>>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's made me think - it shouldn't OT because it's ON topic . . .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 'OT' can mean 'On Topic' can't it?? ;-P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes but, by long tradition, not for this froup.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeap, I knew as much, hence my Smiley!! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops - sense of irony failure on my part.
>>>>>
>>>> Don't you worry about it, Steveski. I'm well aware that a lot of 
>>>> people don't 'get' my sense of humour! ;-P
>>>
>>> IIRC Daniel is simply correct.
>>>
>>> OT usually meant "off-topic" for most groups, but because everyone 
>>> was talking about everything *but* B5, it is usually used to indicate 
>>> "On topic" here.
>>>
>>> Frank
>>
>> Yes, it's a bit unfortunate that the one term,. 'OT', can mean either 
>> of two diametrically opposite things!
> 
> Never mind, *we* know what you mean.

That's good! ;-)
-- 
Daniel