Re: LGBT intolerance

On 11/30/22 12:04 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
> On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode 
> his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and 
> lied:
> 
>> On 11/30/22 10:36 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode 
>>> his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled 
>>> and lied:
>>>
>>>> On 11/29/22 4:10 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/in-colorado-leftists-look-for-excuse-to-criticize-christians 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> Pluralism is dead, and if you want evidence, just talk to the Left 
>>>>> following any national tragedy. On Saturday, Nov. 19, a deranged 
>>>>> shooter entered Club Q , a gay and lesbian nightclub in Colorado 
>>>>> Springs, and killed five innocent people, injuring 19 others. A 
>>>>> horrific incident such as this should be an opportunity for both 
>>>>> political parties to come together in support of a grieving 
>>>>> community. But, of course, one side had to point fingers immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>> The day following the shooting, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 
>>>>> tweeted that it had taken place “after an anti-LGBT+ campaign.” 
>>>>> Vice ran an article about how “the point” of the Right’s opposition 
>>>>> to radical gender and sexuality policies was to cause mass shootings.
>>>>>
>>>>> All this with zero interest in determining the actual motives of 
>>>>> the alleged killer, who is, it turns out, nonbinary .
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> The problem for these anti-religious agitators, though, is that we 
>>>>> still live in an ostensibly pluralistic society. In America, you 
>>>>> should be able to have people who live gay lifestyles and people 
>>>>> who believe that those lifestyles run contrary to their religious 
>>>>> beliefs. Christians should support the legal right of the LGBT 
>>>>> community to live as they choose without having to bake the cake . 
>>>>> Likewise, gay, lesbian, and transgender adults should, without 
>>>>> forcing religious Americans to fly a rainbow flag , be able to make 
>>>>> their own decisions.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will simply never live in a country in which all people agree on 
>>>>> sexual ethics. The best we can hope for is one in which we can 
>>>>> balance the conscience rights and desires of competing groups of 
>>>>> people.
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Food for thought.
>>>>
>>>> Do the mentally ill delusional people 
>>>
>>> Homosexuality is not mental illness.
>>
>> Then you have DNA evidence that can tell who is and isn't gay?
> 
> No, and I also don't have DNA evidence that you don't like deep-fried 
> porcupine testicles, nor evidence that I do like sautéed calf's liver 
> (which I do). 

I don't need taste bud DNA proof because I don't DEMAND a RIGHT to marry 
deep-fried porcupine testicles... or Keep and bear them as "arms".  My 
taste buds are NOT what make me a type of person to which I have RIGHTS 
DELEGATED TO ME due to my unique idea of what tastes good.





> I don't need "DNA evidence" to be able to know what 
> someone's preference is. Neither do you, you brain-damaged shitbag.

And you need no specific RIGHT to marry your favorite foods. Because if 
you do you'll be in for a 3 day psych evaluation "honeymoon" to see just 
how delusional you really are... and your taste buds will be in for a 
shock... they don't serve people who identify as deep-fried porcupine 
testicle lovers the usual foods that require a knife and fork....

> 
> It doesn't matter if there is a genetic element to someone being gay or 
> not. What matters is that you refrain from interfering with LGBTQ 
> people.  If you don't refrain, you will be punished.
> 
When they use DNA evidence in a COURT ROOM to identify the killer, it 
sort of does matter. Either your DNA is who you are or it isn't and if 
you say you're a woman and the DNA of the killer is a man... we have a 
trust issue for that DNA lab or the workers or the process and the test.

If the DNA can't target your "genetic person" then why use it to 
identify that person in a court room?

You need to know things to identify the accused, and DNA will give 
those.  If it can't find a gender called gay then it's NOT a gender and 
it isn't Physical, and if it isn't a physical attribute, then we have to 
look elsewhere what is different that produced the gay... NOT genetics 
you just told us that.

Must be a new hormone... no genetics and blood tests would have revealed 
it... could it be a Christian with a gay soul?  Seems more likely than 
some. I'm down to maybe they are OK but their mind is either 
interpreting signals wrong (physical) or their mind perceives a new 
reality to adjust to a trauma or other problems causing delusions to 
rationalize like someone with neurosis and fear of flying so they'll 
have a million ideas (some delusional) to explain why they can't fly in 
a plane.

Gays sound delusional...




-- 
-Reality Matters-