Re: LGBT intolerance
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/30/22 12:35 PM, Bud Frawley wrote: > On 11/30/2022 9:28 AM, Lee wrote: >> David Hartung wrote: >> >>> On 11/29/22 21:58, duke wrote: >>>> On 11/29/2022 1:10 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not- >>>>> elitism/in-colorado-leftists-look-for-excuse-to-criticize-christia >>>>> ns >>>>> >>>> >>>> "look for excuse to criticize Christians." That's a lie, coming >>>> from a well-known lie site. >>>> >>>> >>>>> The problem for these anti-religious agitators, though, is that >>>>> we still live in an ostensibly pluralistic society. In America, >>>>> you should be able to have people who live gay lifestyles and >>>>> people who believe that those lifestyles run contrary to their >>>>> religious beliefs. >>>> >>>> These are not even remotely equivalent. People who "live gay >>>> livestyles" do not, as a matter of course, say anything about the >>>> "lifestyles" of non-gays. >>> >>> Tell that to those who have been attacked for simply trying to live >>> according to the teachings of their faith, people such as the owners >>> of Sweet Cakes by Melissa. >> >> >> "Live according to your faith"? >> >> How about "live according to THE LAW"? >> >> >>> >>>> But people — asshole "Christian" nationalists — who object to >>>> those "gay lifestyles" go out of their way to denigrate and >>>> persecute queers, and to try to make life harder and inequitable >>>> for them. Here is one example. Queers don't say anything about >>>> asshole "Christian" nationalists trying to adopt children. Asshole >>>> "Christian" nationalists constantly try to erect barriers to >>>> queers adopting children. >>> >>> This is a theological issue, and while I (like most Christians) do >>> oppose the adopting of children by anyone other than heterosexual >>> couples, I am not sure that I can make a case using strictly civil >>> law. >> >> Children do better with gay parents. >> >> >> >> Children raised by same-sex couples >> do better in school, new study finds >> February 6, 2019 >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/02/06/children-raised-by-sa >> me-sex-couples-do-better-school-new-study-finds/ >> > > From the story: > > "The researchers found that same-sex parents are often wealthier, older > and more educated than the typical different-sex couple." And their smart kids grow up to commit suicide more often? > > So it's not the fact that the couple is same-sex — it's some other > demographic features that we already knew are very well correlated with > children's school performance. Children of straight couples who are > also wealthier, older and more educated probably perform just as well as > the children of homosexuals. Cherry picking by Democrats to hide the damage done by mentally ill delusional gay parents that if they lived in realty could better help those kids cope with reality. In the end the gays and the children raised by the gay couple is at higher risk, academia is NOT the only measure of intelligence there's social intellect and the ability to cope with life and solve problems and NOT revert to drugs and sex in a self destructive out of control spiral. An education is not much use if you don't live long enough to use it. -- -Reality Matters-