Re: LGBT intolerance

On 11/30/22 2:14 PM, Mark Wieber wrote:
> On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode 
> his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and 
> lied:
> 
>> On 11/30/22 12:04 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:
>>> On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode 
>>> his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled 
>>> and lied:
>>>
>>>> On 11/30/22 10:36 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On every date, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who 
>>>>> rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly 
>>>>> bawled and lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/29/22 4:10 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/in-colorado-leftists-look-for-excuse-to-criticize-christians 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> Pluralism is dead, and if you want evidence, just talk to the 
>>>>>>> Left following any national tragedy. On Saturday, Nov. 19, a 
>>>>>>> deranged shooter entered Club Q , a gay and lesbian nightclub in 
>>>>>>> Colorado Springs, and killed five innocent people, injuring 19 
>>>>>>> others. A horrific incident such as this should be an opportunity 
>>>>>>> for both political parties to come together in support of a 
>>>>>>> grieving community. But, of course, one side had to point fingers 
>>>>>>> immediately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The day following the shooting, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 
>>>>>>> tweeted that it had taken place “after an anti-LGBT+ campaign.” 
>>>>>>> Vice ran an article about how “the point” of the Right’s 
>>>>>>> opposition to radical gender and sexuality policies was to cause 
>>>>>>> mass shootings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All this with zero interest in determining the actual motives of 
>>>>>>> the alleged killer, who is, it turns out, nonbinary .
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> The problem for these anti-religious agitators, though, is that 
>>>>>>> we still live in an ostensibly pluralistic society. In America, 
>>>>>>> you should be able to have people who live gay lifestyles and 
>>>>>>> people who believe that those lifestyles run contrary to their 
>>>>>>> religious beliefs. Christians should support the legal right of 
>>>>>>> the LGBT community to live as they choose without having to bake 
>>>>>>> the cake . Likewise, gay, lesbian, and transgender adults should, 
>>>>>>> without forcing religious Americans to fly a rainbow flag , be 
>>>>>>> able to make their own decisions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We will simply never live in a country in which all people agree 
>>>>>>> on sexual ethics. The best we can hope for is one in which we can 
>>>>>>> balance the conscience rights and desires of competing groups of 
>>>>>>> people.
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Food for thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do the mentally ill delusional people 
>>>>>
>>>>> Homosexuality is not mental illness.
>>>>
>>>> Then you have DNA evidence that can tell who is and isn't gay?
>>>
>>> No, and I also don't have DNA evidence that you don't like deep-fried 
>>> porcupine testicles, nor evidence that I do like sautéed calf's liver 
>>> (which I do). 
>>
>> I don't need taste bud DNA proof because I don't DEMAND a RIGHT to 
>> marry deep-fried porcupine testicles.
> 
> #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty goes off the rails in the first sentence.
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>> I don't need "DNA evidence" to be able to know what someone's 
>>> preference is. Neither do you, you brain-damaged shitbag.
>>
>> And you need no specific RIGHT to marry your favorite foods.
> 
> No one is talking about marrying foods.  We're talking about a right to 
> marry one other consenting adult.

You're falling behind, you need the RIGHT to marry foods, why is that 
NOT being allowed the same as gay and TRANS marriages...

Is it the human thing, both human and agreeing to it that's only logical 
until you toss in the NON human, NOT really an issue, a single person 
who is monosexual or NON-corporialsexual who wants to marry something 
other than themselves must also have a RIGHT to marry it is it's a non 
sentient being or inanimate object or an organic food?

Once we step into this delusional world of FAKE sexual identities the 
sky is the limit.

What you do doesn't bother me until you force me to believe in your 
delusions by passing laws to have your delusion transferred to creating 
changes in my life... Like stores that have to bake cakes for gays 
weddings, but they may not make cakes for Muslim weddings or Tibetan 
weddings that require Yak Butter and food handling that they don't know 
the specific guide lines and don't want to know or bake to that customer 
base due to the demands that can be made by the customer for 
inappropriate stuff according to the bakery or just NOT profitable to 
have to train the people in all the myriad of different kinds of 
weddings and their particular customs and what might be considered 
heresy and insulting to each, so that some things that might offend 
aren't included by accident and then you get sued for it.

I'd say that's a pretty good reason to Limit the customer base even if 
it's based on religion or sex or color where some races are ultra 
sensitive to things that you might NOT consider offensive to anyone... 
tell me the *Critical Race Theory* fiasco didn't teach you at least that 
much?

There isn't a thing on this planet I would consider worthy of doing in 
the way of working or producing or making or even just selling to any 
CRT group for any amount of money or anything else.

They're HATEFUL NASTY NUTCASES... and you can't base a business on that.

> 
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter if there is a genetic element to someone being gay 
>>> or not. What matters is that you refrain from interfering with LGBTQ 
>>> people.  If you don't refrain, you will be punished.
>>>
>> When they use DNA evidence in a COURT ROOM to identify the killer
> 
> Nothing to do with a person's sexual orientation or preference.
> 

And yet they claim to be a trans woman and wants to compete with women 
and use the women's toilets... and then you tell me it has nothing to do 
with reality...

I tend to think reality is part of the algorithm.


> Being gay is not mental illness.  This is settled.

And yet again reality tells a different story doesn't it since more gays 
commit suicide and become drug addicts and have sexual diseases... Not 
that a mentally ill and self destructive person doesn't have the right 
to smoke cigarettes and drive drunk and risk their own life.... they do.

I just don't need them having special RIGHTS that allow them to do it in 
ways that will also risk my life and LIBERTY.



-- 
-Reality Matters-