Re: LGBT intolerance
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.congress,alt.politics.corruption,alt.censorship,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.election,alt.politics.misc,alt.politics.obama,alt.politics.scorched-earth,alt.politics.socialism.mao,alt.politics.trump,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy,alt.apocolypse,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here,alt.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Support the "Propaganda Wars Open Source Project" to encourage less violence and hate inside America's Borders. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/30/22 6:27 PM, David Hartung wrote: > On 11/30/22 12:34, NoBody wrote: >> On 11/30/2022 10:29 AM, David Hartung wrote: >>> On 11/30/22 11:28, Lee wrote: >>>> David Hartung wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/29/22 21:58, duke wrote: >>>>>> On 11/29/2022 1:10 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/equality-not- >>>>>>> elitism/in-colorado-leftists-look-for-excuse-to-criticize-christia >>>>>>> ns >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "look for excuse to criticize Christians." That's a lie, coming >>>>>> from a well-known lie site. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem for these anti-religious agitators, though, is that >>>>>>> we still live in an ostensibly pluralistic society. In America, >>>>>>> you should be able to have people who live gay lifestyles and >>>>>>> people who believe that those lifestyles run contrary to their >>>>>>> religious beliefs. >>>>>> >>>>>> These are not even remotely equivalent. People who "live gay >>>>>> livestyles" do not, as a matter of course, say anything about the >>>>>> "lifestyles" of non-gays. >>>>> >>>>> Tell that to those who have been attacked for simply trying to live >>>>> according to the teachings of their faith, people such as the owners >>>>> of Sweet Cakes by Melissa. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Live according to your faith"? >>>> >>>> How about "live according to THE LAW"? >>> >>> The law says that the free exercise of religion may not be infringed. >> >> A law telling merchants they can't discriminate against customers >> based on race, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, sexual >> identity, etc. is not an infringement of their free exercise of religion. > > A law telling people that in order to remain in business they must act > contrary to their religious beliefs is an infringement. > Not to mention their Property RIGHTS.... Amendment V *No person shall be* held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, *nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property* , *without due process of law* ; *nor shall private property be taken for* *public use, without just compensation* . -- -Reality Matters-