The Government's *MINISTRY OF TRUTH* is NOW a web of lies : Twitter Files author Taibbi slams Dem congressman after accusation of 'gaslighting' Americans

On 12/26/22 12:38 AM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/twitter-files-author-slams-dem-
> congressman-after-accusation-gaslighting-americans
> 
> Substack writer and journalist Matt Taibbi responded to Rep. Ted Lieu, D-
> Calif., after he accused the Twitter Files author of "gaslighting"
> Americans by tweeting emails detailing the Federal Bureau of
> Investigation's communication with the social media giant.
> 
> ".@elonmusk @mtaibbi @ShellenbergerMD are gaslighting you with their
> misleading "Twitter Files" posts. Here’s the truth: 1. FBI’s Foreign
> Influence Task Force does threat indicator sharing with companies. That’s
> a good thing. 2. Companies decide what to do with that information," Lieu
> said on Wednesday.

1. Apparently NOT a GOOD THING when it violates the RIGHTS of U.S. 
citizens which the FBI is mandated by the 1st Amendment to NOT do, when 
it comes to FREE SPEECH.  These weren't direct threats to TWITTER... so 
where's the FBI crime that they are acting on by reporting it?

There is no way to paint that as a good thing.



2. Companies don't make laws or enforce them, that's the job of the 
government and their enforcement agents like the FBI if the FBI enlisted 
these other "COMPANIES and ENTITIES" to assist they too are bound by the 
limits in the Constitution, the FBI can't hire outside entities to 
violate the Constitution, because it then violates Congress' mandate to 
NOT violate those RIGHTS... and so Congress can't pass appropriations 
laws that pay for such activities.  And Congress is paying for the FBI 
to do their job of enforcement which means that all money appropriated 
by law is required to meet the tests of the Constitution limits and 
delegated powers. And so any money appropriations to fund the FBI are 
now UNCONSTITUTIONAL until they can prove they aren't using it to 
violate the U.S. Constitution. The FBI is officially unfunded due to 
their own actions.  No appropriations for the FBI are legitimate until 
they can verify that that it isn't being misappropriated by the FBI or 
other government agencies doing the same thing...



> "Congressman, why is a 'Foreign Influence' task force sending Excel
> spreadsheets full of joke tweets from low-follower accounts in Maryland,
> Kentucky, and Ohio? Why does the FITF spend so much time reviewing
> domestic speech?" Taibbi said on Saturday.
> 
> Taibbi's response comes after he released a new version of the Twitter
> Files, outlining Twitter's previous communication with "other government
> agencies."
> 
> DEM CONGRESSMAN SLAMMED FOR DISMISSING ‘BREATHLESS’ REPORT ON FBI
> COLLUSION WITH TWITTER: ‘LOOK THE OTHER WAY'
> 
> "Other government agencies" can stand for the Central Intellegence Agency,
> according to Taibbi.
> 
> "The files show the FBI acting as doorman to a vast program of social
> media surveillance and censorship, encompassing agencies across the
> federal government – from the State Department to the Pentagon to the
> CIA," Taibbi said in a tweet.



The Government's *MINISTRY OF TRUTH* is NOW a web of lies.




> 
> Previously, Taibbi tweeted multiple internal files between Twitter workers
> and FBI employees as part of the sixth installment of the Twitter Files.
> 
> "Hello Twitter contacts, FBI San Francisco is notifying you of the below
> accounts which may potentially constitute violations of Twitter's Terms of
> Service for any action or inaction deemed appropriate within Twitter
> policy," one email FBI employee wrote in an email on Nov. 10.
> 

The FBI enforces TWITTER terms of service?  I thought they enforced U.S. 
"Federal" laws.  It's up to TWITTER to enforce their own rules...

This idea that the FBI was doing it for TWITTER is suggesting that 
TWITTER has special FBI security for their personal enforcement of 
COMPANY POLICIES?  Does every company in America get enforcement of 
company policy from the FBI?  Unless a FEDERAL LAW within the "FBI 
JURISDICTION" is being broken... then the FBI have no delegated power to 
be enforcing them.  It appears the FBI is admitting to violating the 
United States Constitution and laws by colluding with TWITTER to 
undermine the U.S. Constitution and to NOT allow for equal protection of 
the law. Company policy is outside the jurisdiction of the FBI. there 
was no "probable cause" and they had no warrant for the violation of any 
law. Which means that engaging in policing the TWITTER COMPANY POLICY 
was illegal.

> In the email, an FBI employee listed several Twitter accounts which might
> violate the social media company's terms of service.
> 
> A Twitter employee responded that three of the four accounts were
> suspended, and asked someone else at the company to review the fourth
> account flagged by the FBI for "possible civic misinformation."

NOT a law that is in any law books is it?

> 
> FBI RESPONDS TO TWITTER FILES DISCLOSURES, SAYS IT DIDN'T REQUEST 'ANY
> ACTION' ON SPECIFIC TWEETS
> 

What delegated powers does the FBI have to enforce TWITTER COMPANY 
POLICY in general?



> Taibbi said that one of the accounts tweeted on Nov. 8, "I want to remind
> republicans to vote tomorrow, Wednesday November 9."
> 
> One of the emails shared by Taibbi shows the "Public Sector Engagement
> Squad" at FBI's San Francisco office notifying Twitter employees of
> "account activities" that "potentially constitute violations of Twitter's
> Terms of Service."
> 
> Another tweet flagged by the FBI states, "Americans, Vote today. Democrats
> you vote Wednesday 9th."
> 
> FBI officials told Fox News that the agency didn't ask Twitter employees
> to "take action" based on the information provided, and said the
> information was provided so that Twitter employees can make a
> determination on whether to take action.


That violates their jurisdictional boundaries at the FBI, they have ZERO 
jurisdiction in CORPORATE policy unless it violated "as in had probable 
cause" that it violated U.S. FEDERAL LAW.

The FBI can't enforce State laws or COMPANY POLICY at TWITTER.

Surveillance is part of law enforcement... at least they tell us it is. 
Which means when they do it it's also bound by laws and the laws 
jurisdiction.  The FBI can't use a States law to file for a federal 
warrant for the FBI to survive a person or group. It would need to be a 
FEDERAL LAW used to obtain the warrant for an FBI surveillance.

And those FBI AGENTS were doing surveillance on the job and using a 
secure back door connection to TWITTER.


> "We are providing it so that they can take whatever action they deem
> appropriate under their terms of service to protect their platform and
> protect their customers, but we never direct or ask them to take action,"
> the FBI officials said.

The DNC told the FBI to stay out when their offices were hacked, and 
theft of documents is a crime but the FBI never looked into the crime 
they simply told the DNC they may have been hacked but that was an 
actual crime where the FBI had *probable cause* . They never 
investigated, why is that?


But that's surveillance, without a warrant.  And what's worse it 
targeted one political group.  They didn't target Democrats. Or target 
general violations they were targeting specific subjects they wanted to 
censor.

That violates the the 1st amendment as it applies to free speech and the 
free press.

> In a statement shared with Fox News, an FBI spokesperson said, "The
> correspondence between the FBI and Twitter show nothing more than examples
> of our traditional, longstanding and ongoing federal government and
> private sector engagements, which involve numerous companies over multiple
> sectors and industries. As evidenced in the correspondence, the FBI
> provides critical information to the private sector in an effort to allow
> them to protect themselves and their customers."


It isn't protection when they target people NOT violating any laws.  And 
the Company can enforce their own Company Policies... no additional FBI 
management of that is even legal until there is probable cause or a 
warrant to trigger the investigation.


> "The men and women of the FBI work every day to protect the American
> public. It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding
> the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to
> discredit the agency," the spokesperson added.
> 


Isn't it a Conspiracy theory to spread the disinformation that someone 
was engaging in "possible civic misinformation" when there is no law 
that regulates such a thing.  To pose the inference that someone or some 
group is engaging in "possible civic misinformation" without providing 
the FACTS that expose that "civic misinformation" to be untrue, is 
creating an FBI conspiracy theory that those people/entities were 
attempting to commit a TWITTER VIOLATION or VIOLATE a FEDERAL LAW with 
no probable cause or evidence.

We know they have no evidence of a crime or they would place a gag order 
on all the information and then hide or lose all the evidence depending 
on who the accused was and what their politics were.

We just saw that a FEDERAL judge dismissed a case in ARIZONA where KERRY 
LAKE was trying to prove that someone violated the voter laws and the 
judge said there was no proof that anyone "intended to violate" the 
laws.... so where was the proof of "intent" where the FBI was reporting 
FREE SPEECH VIOLATIONS, if it's good for VOTER RIGHTS why wouldn't it be 
good enough to require that standard for FREE SPEECH RIGHTS?




> Fox News' Jake Gibson contributed to this report.
> 
> Comments:
> 
> jacksone
> 1 day ago
> 
> Can the FBI or Twitter show us a time when false information that was
> unfavorable to Republicans was pointed out by the FBI? They are riding a
> very fine line in interfering with free speech. The FBI should not be in
> the business of helping Twitter, a private company enforce its own rules.
> Surely there are more important things for the FBI to be doing then
> getting involved in the political speech of Americans.
> 
> commoncentsmi
> 1 day ago
> 
> Like attending, and the surveillance of parents who attend school board
> meetings!
> 
> kstron71
> 1 day ago
> 
> Can the FBI or Twitter show us a time when false information that was
> unfavorable to Republicans was pointed out by the FBI?
> 
> The Hunter Biden laptop isn't enough? lol. It was all true. The FBI knew
> it or are incompetent from the start.
> 
> 


-- 
-Reality Matters-

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/12/09/elise-stefanik-twitter-lied-to-congress-about-shadow-banning-conservatives/
-------------------------------------------------------

And TWITTER and the FBI lied about working together as a part of the 
SHADOW GOVERNMENT to limit free speech.

They became the *Ministry of TRUTH* that was run by the *SHADOW* 
*GOVERNMENT* .

For those out there that said *the SHADOW GOVERNMENT is tinfoil hat* 
*territory*  ...you better stock up on tinfoil.