Re: Note for JOHN HENRY DEJONG - proven and admitted liar

"Davey Zimmerman #274" <[email protected]> wrote in 
news:[email protected]:

> "Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)" <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]: 
> 
>> Laz Pinto <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]: 
>> 
>>> Re: Google search results for your name
>>> 
>>> You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not 
>>> indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as 
>>> containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a 
>>> "Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups. 
>>> alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
>>> have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly,
>>> these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search
>>> engine. 
>>> 
>>> In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
>>> threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
>>> be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so remove
>>> the problematic posts from Google search results for your name.
>>> 
>>> A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or violent
>>> content, shared personal info, or the promotion of regulated goods
>>> and services at the group, conversation, or message level" found in
>>> the group could be the push needed for Google to dustbin this group
>>> and solve at least one of your problems.  A solid effort would need
>>> to involve reporting individual messages as well as
>>> threads/"conversations".  As well, for illegal content you'd want to
>>> report messages through the troubleshooting interface at
>>> https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See more
>>> products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
>>> "http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
>>> Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies". Google
>>> encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but you must
>>> file each report separately". 
>>> 
>>> Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
>>> which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
>>> property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
>>> believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll review
>>> the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing access to
>>> it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
>>> 
>>> I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could 
>>> support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your 
>>> complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
>>> all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or a
>>> violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
>>> take action. 
>>> 
>>> And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false 
>>> flags. 
>>> 
>>> You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
>>> saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google Groups.
>>> You can do it.
>>> 
>> 
>> Google is as well-known for their prompt responsiveness to complaints
>> as John Henry DeJong is for his diligence in executing projects
>> requiring more than superficial effort. Godspeed!
> 
> JOHN HENRY DEJONG will do nothing and expect others to do his dirty work
> for him. After all, he's done a great job cleaning up all the parody
> sites about him that have been around for the last 15 years, so this
> will be no different. 

He can't clean up those parody pages because Facebook's algorithms have been 
influenced by a worldwide fake liberal consipracy to silence him and shut him 
down. Every time he clicks report, the plutocrat algorithm changes it into a like.

> Five years ago he was going to file a police report on Alexander Cain
> and if that didn't work out, he was going down there to beat the crap
> out of him, file a lawsuit and evict him. 

He didn't specify his destination in the recent rant where he threatened to 
create papier mache mallets and go hitchhiking or whatever. It's possible Cain is 
still in danger.

> In a shocking revelation, it turns out JOHN HENRY DEJONG lied about all
> of that. Since then, it's another set of enemies who had nothing to do
> with Cain that he refuses to name. 
> 
> Let me know when alt.bonehead.john-henry gets cleaned up too. 
> 

alt.bonehead-john-henry will be referred to the FBI and Attorney General as soon 
as the matter of his former landlord cutting the brake lines to his Jeep is 
handled by the City Council.