Re: Note for JOHN HENRY DEJONG - proven and admitted liar

"Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: 

> "Davey Zimmerman #274" <[email protected]> wrote in 
> news:[email protected]:
> 
>> "Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]: 
>> 
>>> Laz Pinto <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> news:[email protected]: 
>>> 
>>>> Re: Google search results for your name
>>>> 
>>>> You may or may not have noticed that certain Usenet groups are not 
>>>> indexed by Google Groups. Groups which have "been identified as 
>>>> containing spam, malware, or other malicious content" only yield a 
>>>> "Banned content warning" when navigating to them in Google Groups. 
>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, misc.consumers, alt.suicide.holiday, and others
>>>> have been permanently removed from Google Groups. Most importantly,
>>>> these groups and their content are not indexed in Google's search
>>>> engine. 
>>>> 
>>>> In your recent RSPW exposé, you showed that you'd been flagging
>>>> threads for abuse. If you really put some effort into it, you might
>>>> be able to get RSPW removed from Google Groups and in doing so
>>>> remove the problematic posts from Google search results for your
>>>> name. 
>>>> 
>>>> A good weeklong effort to report all instances of "hateful or
>>>> violent content, shared personal info, or the promotion of
>>>> regulated goods and services at the group, conversation, or message
>>>> level" found in the group could be the push needed for Google to
>>>> dustbin this group and solve at least one of your problems.  A
>>>> solid effort would need to involve reporting individual messages as
>>>> well as threads/"conversations".  As well, for illegal content
>>>> you'd want to report messages through the troubleshooting interface
>>>> at https://support.google.com/legal/ troubleshooter/1114905 (->See
>>>> more products->Google Groups). Google also recommends visiting
>>>> "http://support.google.com for non-legal issues that concern
>>>> Google’s Terms of Service or content and product policies".
>>>> Google encourages reporting the same content using both paths, "but
>>>> you must file each report separately". 
>>>> 
>>>> Certain RSPWers have reposted things from your social media here,
>>>> which may be challengeable as infringement of your intellectual
>>>> property rights. "If you see content on a Google product that you
>>>> believe violates the law or your rights, let us know. We’ll
>>>> review the material and consider blocking, limiting, or removing
>>>> access to it" - https:// support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sure there are other reasons covered under the ToS which could 
>>>> support formal complaints. If you were to extend the scope of your 
>>>> complaining beyond messages which affect you personally and went
>>>> all-in reporting everything which could be constituted as abuse or
>>>> a violation, such a flood of valid complaints might cause Google to
>>>> take action. 
>>>> 
>>>> And if above-ground methods aren't sufficient, there's always false
>>>> flags. 
>>>> 
>>>> You have the power to get this done. Your online reputation can be
>>>> saved. This is nonviolent direct action. Kill RSPW on Google
>>>> Groups. You can do it.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Google is as well-known for their prompt responsiveness to
>>> complaints as John Henry DeJong is for his diligence in executing
>>> projects requiring more than superficial effort. Godspeed!
>> 
>> JOHN HENRY DEJONG will do nothing and expect others to do his dirty
>> work for him. After all, he's done a great job cleaning up all the
>> parody sites about him that have been around for the last 15 years,
>> so this will be no different. 
> 
> He can't clean up those parody pages because Facebook's algorithms
> have been influenced by a worldwide fake liberal consipracy to silence
> him and shut him down. Every time he clicks report, the plutocrat
> algorithm changes it into a like. 

Damn you, Matt Desmond! Some day you and your millions of friends will
be brought to justice for laughing at JOHN HENRY DEJONG. 

It's coming, but JOHN HENRY DEJONG has more important things to attend
to. So right after he sue Alexander Cain, your ass is grass and JOHN
HENRY DEJONG will be the lawnmower! 

>> Five years ago he was going to file a police report on Alexander Cain
>> and if that didn't work out, he was going down there to beat the crap
>> out of him, file a lawsuit and evict him. 
> 
> He didn't specify his destination in the recent rant where he
> threatened to create papier mache mallets and go hitchhiking or
> whatever. It's possible Cain is still in danger.

I think at this point that Cain should avoid nearby dumpsters,
particularly if they contain broken monitors. JOHN HENRY DEJONG may be
lurking nearby and may try to wheeze on him. 

>> In a shocking revelation, it turns out JOHN HENRY DEJONG lied about
>> all of that. Since then, it's another set of enemies who had nothing
>> to do with Cain that he refuses to name. 
>> 
>> Let me know when alt.bonehead.john-henry gets cleaned up too. 
>> 
> 
> alt.bonehead-john-henry will be referred to the FBI and Attorney
> General as soon as the matter of his former landlord cutting the brake
> lines to his Jeep is handled by the City Council.

That reminds me! How is that lawsuit going where JOHN HENRY DEJONG is
suing his last Utah landlords for throwing out his most treasured junk?
Has he found a lawyer that will work for free so he can sue the fuck out
of the bastards and strike a blow for deadbeat tenants everywhere?