Re: Exciting New Birth Control Method Called “S ocialism”

On 7/30/2026 1:09 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:40:46 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> On 7/29/2026 5:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 7/29/26 1:33 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> "The socialist city may promise to care for every child — but
>>>> increasingly, it just doesn’t contain any. A new Wall Street Journal
>>>> analysis finds that, over the past decade, American cities lost
>>>> children six times faster than the country overall. Some cities that
>>>> grew still lost kids, replacing families with trust-fund singles,
>>>> yuppies, and people too poor to leave.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, the five fastest-growing American cities in 2025? Well,
>>>> they were all exurbs in Texas. To state the obvious revealed
>>>> preference: middle-class moms and dads do not want to raise their kids
>>>> amongst dangerous fentanyl addicts while spending 70% of their income
>>>> on housing, all while sending little Johnny to chaotic public schools
>>>> (with the fent addicts’ dealers’ kids), so they leave. In that void,
>>>> the DSA happily agitates for class warfare, because the actual
>>>> solution (building housing) requires motivated capitalists — whom DSA
>>>> leaders hate more than their dads."
>>>
>>> socialism now is when local rich people using zoning regulations in
>>> local govts to block high density housing projects driving up land
>>> prices in a market, causing families to move where vast tracks of land
>>> exist outside of locations where rich people block housing projects...
>>
>> Government causes problem.
>>
>> Collectivists blame it on rich people.
> 
> Rich people hide in the shadows claiming innocence, while they buy
> politicians to do their public actions for them.

And you (apparently) think the solution to that is to get rid of rich 
people.

That will only break things more.