Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On 7/31/26 9:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 7/30/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:34:31 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 7/28/2026 5:36 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/26 2:10 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/28/2026 3:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i still won't trust or support private companies running nuclear
>>>>>> shipping dud, ur just a negligent retard who willfully ignores how
>>>>>> that record was produced because ur nothing more than unrepentant
>>>>>> ideologue
>>>>>
>>>>> And you think centralized command and control is a panacea, 
>>>>> apparently.
>>>>
>>>> that's what produced the record wilson: a strict military hierarchy
>>>> dealing with life/death decision making, where command comes entirely
>>>> from within and is strictly audited in performance for actual decades
>>>> before given major positions of command
>>>>
>>>> on what basis do have to show that the private market will be anything
>>>> of that sort...
>>>>
>>>> just more _bear_ assertions, eh?
>>>
>>> Ah, so the best possible scenario you can imagine is a world that is
>>> based on a military structure.
>>>
>>> Got it.
>>
>> No, the implication is that profit motive does not provide the kind of
>> minds that society needs.
> 
> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when the 
> participants have a shared and broad ethical system that values (among 
> other things) treating others fairly, the same way most of us want to be 
> treated.
> 

coercive border control certainly isn't treating people fairly u twat lol

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃