Re: Exciting New Birth Control Method Called “S ocialism”

On 7/31/2026 12:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 7/31/26 9:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 7/30/2026 12:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 7/30/26 7:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 7/29/2026 5:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 7/29/26 1:33 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> "The socialist city may promise to care for every child — but 
>>>>>> increasingly, it just doesn’t contain any. A new Wall Street 
>>>>>> Journal analysis finds that, over the past decade, American cities 
>>>>>> lost children six times faster than the country overall. Some 
>>>>>> cities that grew still lost kids, replacing families with trust- 
>>>>>> fund singles, yuppies, and people too poor to leave.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile, the five fastest-growing American cities in 2025? Well, 
>>>>>> they were all exurbs in Texas. To state the obvious revealed 
>>>>>> preference: middle-class moms and dads do not want to raise their 
>>>>>> kids amongst dangerous fentanyl addicts while spending 70% of 
>>>>>> their income on housing, all while sending little Johnny to 
>>>>>> chaotic public schools (with the fent addicts’ dealers’ kids), so 
>>>>>> they leave. In that void, the DSA happily agitates for class 
>>>>>> warfare, because the actual solution (building housing) requires 
>>>>>> motivated capitalists — whom DSA leaders hate more than their dads."
>>>>>
>>>>> socialism now is when local rich people using zoning regulations in 
>>>>> local govts to block high density housing projects driving up land 
>>>>> prices in a market, causing families to move where vast tracks of 
>>>>> land exist outside of locations where rich people block housing 
>>>>> projects...
>>>>
>>>> Government causes problem.
>>>>
>>>> Collectivists blame it on rich people.
>>>
>>> yes bro, our govts are largely not run collectively, they are largely 
>>> run by the wealthy to manage the collective.
>>
>> Hey, here's an idea. If the government is the problem fix the government.
> 
> yeah and how do we do that when the livelihoods of politicians are 
> entirely predicated on the wealthy donors who fund them??? 

Not only that, but the people who make up the permanent administrative 
state want their nest feathered as well.