Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...

On 8/1/26 9:17 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 7/31/2026 6:45 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 7/31/26 1:14 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 7/31/2026 2:31 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 7/31/26 10:14 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/31/2026 12:22 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/31/26 9:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best when 
>>>>>>> the participants have a shared and broad ethical system that 
>>>>>>> values (among other things) treating others fairly, the same way 
>>>>>>> most of us want to be treated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> coercive border control certainly isn't treating people fairly u 
>>>>>> twat lol
>>>>>
>>>>> Open borders, which drive down pay for the lowest earners, are 
>>>>> certainly not treating the people who already live there fairly, 
>>>>> you mental munchkin.
>>>>
>>>> errr ... so competing in an open labor market is now unfair because 
>>>> it results in the market driving down the price of labor???
>>>>
>>>> that's exactly the market working as intended, what exactly is 
>>>> unfair about it???
>>>>
>>>> what actual ethical principle has even been violated???
>>>
>>> Not allowing the owners to have a say in how things are run.
>>
>> ummm ... why would "the owners" /want/ to override the principles of 
>> free and open markets dud???
>>
>> it brings prosperity for all, eh?
> 
> Because they might see certain actions as acting against their best 
> interests, like collectivists do for instance.

so ur just arbitrarily deciding when to not abide by free market 
principles... when it suits you???

how is _that_ fairness???

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃