Re: The unspoken truth about wildfires
Wilson <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 12:50:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/31/2026 11:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:54:09 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 7/31/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 21:28:14 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 5:23:29?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:20:28 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/31/2026 2:06 PM, Tara wrote: >>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 12:40:32?PM EDT, "Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 3:50 PM, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>> Julian <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:56, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:53:09?PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:29, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:04:17?PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sadly he was proved right. So was I. After I warned in these very pages >>>>>>>>>>>>>> last year that government policy was worsening the fire risk on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> moorland, it gives me no pleasure to say: ?I told you so.? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Ridley >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Indigenous peoples in North America have been conrolling the threat of wild >>>>>>>>>>>>> fires with prescribed/controlled burns for centuries. Canada is looking to do >>>>>>>>>>>>> the same in co-operation with our native people. We have a problem doing this >>>>>>>>>>>>> however because of the acessibility and vastness of our forests. But in a >>>>>>>>>>>>> country the size of Britain (and other European countries), it seems to me >>>>>>>>>>>>> that controlled fires are a no brainer. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are inaccessible fires in vast forests really a problem? >>>>>>>>>>>> I think they're as likely good for the land's long term health. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is that, but an uncontrolled fire can massively grow and send a lot of >>>>>>>>>>> smoke to people populated areas. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A bit like a volcano. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah like that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The northeast US is hundreds of miles from the wildfires yet we've had >>>>>>>> serious air quality warnings this year and last. A few weeks ago it >>>>>>>> literally dimmed the sun for several days, making what was otherwise a >>>>>>>> clear day look cloudy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildfires-smoke-millions-exposed-midwest-northeast-us/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those pictures are not an exaggeration. That's what it really looked like. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Meanwhile the idiot treehuggers think they know what's best. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am an admitted tree hugger but I am also a realist and think that one answer >>>>>>> here is controlled burning. Another is education and strictly enforced laws >>>>>>> against those who are careless and start fires through laziness and ignorance, >>>>>>> clearing vegetation around and near dwellings and building fire resistent >>>>>>> homes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes I agree. The funny thing is, the idiot treehuggers I'm talking about >>>>>> are killing more trees by not allowing beneficial things like controlled >>>>>> burns. >>>>> >>>>> Asl if tree huggers had the power to allow or not allow anything. >>>> >>>> They vote. >>> >>> Same as the tree choppers. >>> >> Just for the record you live in a house made out of lumber, right? > > Brick mostly. Almost all brick houses have timber frame construction. The brick is just on the outside.