Re: assuming we don't have a 100x unicorn improvement in battery tech anytime soon ...
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Aug 2026 13:28:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 13:22:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >On 8/1/2026 12:38 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 8/1/26 9:17 AM, Wilson wrote: >>> On 7/31/2026 6:45 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 7/31/26 1:14 PM, Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 7/31/2026 2:31 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/31/26 10:14 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/31/2026 12:22 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/31/26 9:16 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There's this thing called ethics. The free market works best >>>>>>>>> when the participants have a shared and broad ethical system >>>>>>>>> that values (among other things) treating others fairly, the >>>>>>>>> same way most of us want to be treated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> coercive border control certainly isn't treating people fairly u >>>>>>>> twat lol >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Open borders, which drive down pay for the lowest earners, are >>>>>>> certainly not treating the people who already live there fairly, >>>>>>> you mental munchkin. >>>>>> >>>>>> errr ... so competing in an open labor market is now unfair because >>>>>> it results in the market driving down the price of labor??? >>>>>> >>>>>> that's exactly the market working as intended, what exactly is >>>>>> unfair about it??? >>>>>> >>>>>> what actual ethical principle has even been violated??? >>>>> >>>>> Not allowing the owners to have a say in how things are run. >>>> >>>> ummm ... why would "the owners" /want/ to override the principles of >>>> free and open markets dud??? >>>> >>>> it brings prosperity for all, eh? >>> >>> Because they might see certain actions as acting against their best >>> interests, like collectivists do for instance. >> >> so ur just arbitrarily deciding when to not abide by free market >> principles... when it suits you??? >> >> how is _that_ fairness??? > >It isn't. But it is self-interest and before we throw that out like Noah >says he wants to do, we need to take a good hard look at what the world >would be like if we don't allow people to materially improve their lives >through their own efforts. Why, they could be materially improving life in society generally. Imagine that. I know, scary,. -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away