Re: The unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/1/2026 1:07 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 12:52:40 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 7/31/2026 6:44 PM, Creon wrote:
>>> At Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:20:28 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/31/2026 2:06 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 12:40:32?PM EDT, "Wilson"
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 3:50 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>> Julian <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:56, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:53:09?PM EDT, "Julian"
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:29, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:04:17?PM EDT, "Julian"
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sadly he was proved right. So was I. After I warned in these
>>>>>>>>>>>> very pages last year that government policy was worsening
>>>>>>>>>>>> the fire risk on moorland, it gives me no pleasure to say:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘I told you so.’
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Ridley
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Indigenous peoples in North America have been conrolling the
>>>>>>>>>>> threat of wild fires with prescribed/controlled burns for
>>>>>>>>>>> centuries. Canada is looking to do the same in co-operation
>>>>>>>>>>> with our native people. We have a problem doing this however
>>>>>>>>>>> because of the acessibility and vastness of our forests. But
>>>>>>>>>>> in a country the size of Britain (and other European
>>>>>>>>>>> countries), it seems to me that controlled fires are a no
>>>>>>>>>>> brainer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are inaccessible fires in vast forests really a problem?
>>>>>>>>>> I think they're as likely good for the land's long term health.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is that, but an uncontrolled fire can massively grow and
>>>>>>>>> send a lot of smoke to people populated areas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A bit like a volcano.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah like that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The northeast US is hundreds of miles from the wildfires yet we've
>>>>>> had serious air quality warnings this year and last. A few weeks
>>>>>> ago it literally dimmed the sun for several days, making what was
>>>>>> otherwise a clear day look cloudy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildfires-smoke-millions-exposed-midwest-northeast-us/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those pictures are not an exaggeration. That's what it really
>>>>>> looked like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile the idiot treehuggers think they know what's best.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am an admitted tree hugger but I am also a realist and think that
>>>>> one answer here is controlled burning. Another is education and
>>>>> strictly enforced laws against those who are careless and start
>>>>> fires through laziness and ignorance, clearing vegetation around
>>>>> and near dwellings and building fire resistent homes.
>>>>
>>>> Yes I agree. The funny thing is, the idiot treehuggers I'm talking
>>>> about are killing more trees by not allowing beneficial things like
>>>> controlled burns.
>>>
>>> Not true.
>>>
>>> You seem to be living about four decades behind, Sir.
>>
>> Because you say so?
>>
>> Who's stopping the controlled burns and brush clearing in California?
>> It's not the foresters.
> 
> Nobody, I suspect.  

The government of California is not allowing controlled burns.

But as always, store clerks and truck drivers
> think they need to tell professionals how to do their job.  How to
> manage (where and when) controlled burning for instance.

You seem quite happy to leave it to the politicians and functionaries 
who cosplay as experts.