Re: West Coast Messed Coast

dart200 <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 18:57:02 -0700
Newsgroups alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/1/26 6:39 PM, Dude wrote:
> "Seattle's identity crisis in this changing political culture comes from 
> a breakdown of norms. It's a place where virtue signaling to reflect the 
> latest fad takes precedence over character and what works. Tradition is 
> now an apparition, a vestige of a memory."
> 
> PJ Media:
> 
> Seattle Is in Free Fall
> 
> https://tinyurl.com/bdenu3f8

i asked grok to refute it:

The article is a partisan rant that selectively highlights real 
challenges while ignoring data, context, and long-term trends that 
undercut the "freefall" narrative. Seattle faces serious 
problems—homelessness, high costs, political volatility, and periodic 
violent incidents—but the claim of systemic collapse driven uniquely by 
recent progressive leadership does not hold up.

- Leadership turnover is real but not unprecedented or uniquely damning

Seattle has cycled through multiple police chiefs in recent years 
(including Shon Barnes, who resigned in late July 2026 after criticism 
of the response to the Bite of Seattle shooting). High turnover in the 
chief role has been a feature for over a decade, spanning different 
mayors and political climates.

Mayoral continuity has also been uneven historically. The article 
correctly notes limited consecutive two-term mayors and the 2017 
succession (Murray → Harrell interim → Burgess → Durkan). Katie Wilson 
took office in January 2026 after a close 2025 election win over 
incumbent Bruce Harrell. She is a democratic socialist and former 
organizer; her early tenure includes pushing shelter capacity, transit, 
and affordability measures while managing a high-profile shooting and 
the subsequent chief change.

Turnover reflects real friction (consent decrees, post-2020 staffing 
crises, polarized politics), not proof that the city is ungovernable or 
uniquely "commie"-driven into chaos.

- Crime trends contradict freefall claims

Overall crime fell ~18% in 2025 versus 2024, with homicides down 36% (37 
vs. 58) and nonfatal shootings also sharply lower. Clearance rates 
improved. Early 2026 data show continued declines in total crime and 
shootings; Seattle recorded its first homicide-free June since 1970.
The Bite of Seattle shooting was a genuine tragedy involving apparent 
gang activity and a "ghost gun." Isolated high-profile violence does not 
reverse multi-year downward trends that track national patterns of 
post-2020 recovery. Police staffing has improved after earlier losses 
(net gains in 2025). Claims that leaders "think cops don't matter" 
ignore hiring incentives, recovery efforts, and data showing reduced 
violence under the prior administration that Wilson inherited.

- Business and "exodus" claims are overstated and ahistorical

Boeing: Headquarters left for Chicago in 2001—decades before the 
progressive wave the article blames. Production remains heavily 
concentrated in the Puget Sound region. Recent CEO comments emphasized 
proximity to engineering and manufacturing there.

Amazon: Still maintains a massive Seattle-area presence (HQ1 framing 
includes Bellevue/Redmond growth). Seattle headcount has declined from 
pandemic peaks due to layoffs, efficiency, remote/hybrid shifts, and 
cost pressures common across tech—not a unique Seattle collapse. It 
remains one of Washington's largest employers.

Starbucks: Global HQ remains in Seattle. Opening/expanding offices 
elsewhere (e.g., Nashville) is standard corporate diversification for 
logistics, costs, and talent—not evidence the city is being abandoned. 
Founder Howard Schultz has long lived outside the city at times.

Tech contraction, AI-driven efficiency, high housing costs, and taxes 
are real headwinds shared by many coastal cities. Seattle retains major 
corporate anchors, a strong talent pipeline (University of Washington, 
etc.), and ongoing investment. Framing every expansion elsewhere as 
proof of "greedy mistress" rejection ignores how multinationals operate.

Broader context the article skips

Post-2020 challenges (CHOP/CHAZ, staffing losses, visible disorder) were 
real and damaged confidence. Progressive policies on homelessness, 
policing, and taxes have drawn legitimate criticism for uneven results 
and business friction. World Cup preparations showed the city can 
concentrate resources for order when prioritized. Homelessness and 
affordability remain acute; Wilson's early shelter targets have 
lagged.These are serious policy debates. Hyperbolic language 
("overeducated, inexperienced commie," "Antifa flying monkeys," chaos as 
"mission statement") substitutes invective for analysis. Crime is down 
substantially from recent peaks. Core economic engines have not fled en 
masse. Leadership churn is a recurring feature, not sudden freefall. 
Seattle has genuine problems that demand better governance and 
trade-offs, but the article's apocalyptic framing is not supported by 
the data.

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃