Re: West Coast Messed Coast
dart200 <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 18:57:02 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/1/26 6:39 PM, Dude wrote:
> "Seattle's identity crisis in this changing political culture comes from
> a breakdown of norms. It's a place where virtue signaling to reflect the
> latest fad takes precedence over character and what works. Tradition is
> now an apparition, a vestige of a memory."
>
> PJ Media:
>
> Seattle Is in Free Fall
>
> https://tinyurl.com/bdenu3f8
i asked grok to refute it:
The article is a partisan rant that selectively highlights real
challenges while ignoring data, context, and long-term trends that
undercut the "freefall" narrative. Seattle faces serious
problems—homelessness, high costs, political volatility, and periodic
violent incidents—but the claim of systemic collapse driven uniquely by
recent progressive leadership does not hold up.
- Leadership turnover is real but not unprecedented or uniquely damning
Seattle has cycled through multiple police chiefs in recent years
(including Shon Barnes, who resigned in late July 2026 after criticism
of the response to the Bite of Seattle shooting). High turnover in the
chief role has been a feature for over a decade, spanning different
mayors and political climates.
Mayoral continuity has also been uneven historically. The article
correctly notes limited consecutive two-term mayors and the 2017
succession (Murray → Harrell interim → Burgess → Durkan). Katie Wilson
took office in January 2026 after a close 2025 election win over
incumbent Bruce Harrell. She is a democratic socialist and former
organizer; her early tenure includes pushing shelter capacity, transit,
and affordability measures while managing a high-profile shooting and
the subsequent chief change.
Turnover reflects real friction (consent decrees, post-2020 staffing
crises, polarized politics), not proof that the city is ungovernable or
uniquely "commie"-driven into chaos.
- Crime trends contradict freefall claims
Overall crime fell ~18% in 2025 versus 2024, with homicides down 36% (37
vs. 58) and nonfatal shootings also sharply lower. Clearance rates
improved. Early 2026 data show continued declines in total crime and
shootings; Seattle recorded its first homicide-free June since 1970.
The Bite of Seattle shooting was a genuine tragedy involving apparent
gang activity and a "ghost gun." Isolated high-profile violence does not
reverse multi-year downward trends that track national patterns of
post-2020 recovery. Police staffing has improved after earlier losses
(net gains in 2025). Claims that leaders "think cops don't matter"
ignore hiring incentives, recovery efforts, and data showing reduced
violence under the prior administration that Wilson inherited.
- Business and "exodus" claims are overstated and ahistorical
Boeing: Headquarters left for Chicago in 2001—decades before the
progressive wave the article blames. Production remains heavily
concentrated in the Puget Sound region. Recent CEO comments emphasized
proximity to engineering and manufacturing there.
Amazon: Still maintains a massive Seattle-area presence (HQ1 framing
includes Bellevue/Redmond growth). Seattle headcount has declined from
pandemic peaks due to layoffs, efficiency, remote/hybrid shifts, and
cost pressures common across tech—not a unique Seattle collapse. It
remains one of Washington's largest employers.
Starbucks: Global HQ remains in Seattle. Opening/expanding offices
elsewhere (e.g., Nashville) is standard corporate diversification for
logistics, costs, and talent—not evidence the city is being abandoned.
Founder Howard Schultz has long lived outside the city at times.
Tech contraction, AI-driven efficiency, high housing costs, and taxes
are real headwinds shared by many coastal cities. Seattle retains major
corporate anchors, a strong talent pipeline (University of Washington,
etc.), and ongoing investment. Framing every expansion elsewhere as
proof of "greedy mistress" rejection ignores how multinationals operate.
Broader context the article skips
Post-2020 challenges (CHOP/CHAZ, staffing losses, visible disorder) were
real and damaged confidence. Progressive policies on homelessness,
policing, and taxes have drawn legitimate criticism for uneven results
and business friction. World Cup preparations showed the city can
concentrate resources for order when prioritized. Homelessness and
affordability remain acute; Wilson's early shelter targets have
lagged.These are serious policy debates. Hyperbolic language
("overeducated, inexperienced commie," "Antifa flying monkeys," chaos as
"mission statement") substitutes invective for analysis. Crime is down
substantially from recent peaks. Core economic engines have not fled en
masse. Leadership churn is a recurring feature, not sudden freefall.
Seattle has genuine problems that demand better governance and
trade-offs, but the article's apocalyptic framing is not supported by
the data.
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃