Re: The unspoken truth about wildfires
dart200 <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 18:57:45 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/1/26 12:21 PM, Dude wrote: > On 8/1/2026 9:53 AM, dart200 wrote: >> On 8/1/26 9:50 AM, Dude wrote: >>> On 7/31/2026 8:25 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 7/31/26 7:35 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>> On 7/31/2026 3:59 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 7/31/26 3:54 PM, Tara wrote: >>>>>>> Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/31/2026 2:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:46:39 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2026 12:13 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/26 12:10 PM, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 2:25:03?PM EDT, "Julian" >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31/07/2026 19:06, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 12:40:32?PM EDT, "Wilson" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 3:50 PM, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:56, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:53:09?PM EDT, "Julian" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30/07/2026 19:29, Tara wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2026 at 2:04:17?PM EDT, "Julian" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sadly he was proved right. So was I. After I warned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very pages >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last year that government policy was worsening the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fire risk on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moorland, it gives me no pleasure to say: ‘I told >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you so.’ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Ridley >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indigenous peoples in North America have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conrolling the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat of wild >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fires with prescribed/controlled burns for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> centuries. Canada >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is looking to do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same in co-operation with our native people. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem doing this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> however because of the acessibility and vastness of our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forests. But in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> country the size of Britain (and other European >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries), it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that controlled fires are a no brainer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are inaccessible fires in vast forests really a problem? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think they're as likely good for the land's long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> term health. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is that, but an uncontrolled fire can massively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grow and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send a lot of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smoke to people populated areas. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A bit like a volcano. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah like that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The northeast US is hundreds of miles from the wildfires >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet we've had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious air quality warnings this year and last. A few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks ago it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> literally dimmed the sun for several days, making what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was otherwise a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear day look cloudy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildfires-smoke-millions- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exposed- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> midwest-northeast-us/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those pictures are not an exaggeration. That's what it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked like. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile the idiot treehuggers think they know what's best. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am an admitted tree hugger but I am also a realist and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one answer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here is controlled burning. Another is education and strictly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforced laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>> against those who are careless and start fires through >>>>>>>>>>>>>> laziness and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorance, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing vegetation around and near dwellings and building >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fire >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resistent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> homes. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That would probably be more effective than increasing the >>>>>>>>>>>>> price >>>>>>>>>>>>> of petrol, gas and electricity for already stretched workers. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> yah. And somebody should point out to the 'tree huggers' >>>>>>>>>>>> that controlled >>>>>>>>>>>> burning actually saves more trees than not doing it because >>>>>>>>>>>> left to >>>>>>>>>>>> itself >>>>>>>>>>>> wildfires will continue to happen. And trees will burn even >>>>>>>>>>>> more so >>>>>>>>>>>> because of >>>>>>>>>>>> the weather changes and encroachment. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> given that u actually live in canada maybe u should spend >>>>>>>>>>> half a second >>>>>>>>>>> researching what it takes to do effective fuel management for >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> forests ur actually talking about >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> god boomers are so stupid >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That should wrap up the discussion about the unspoken truth about >>>>>>>>>> wildfires. Good work, Nick! You really trashed Tara's theory by >>>>>>>>>> suggesting that, since she lives in the Canadian forest, she >>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> research it using Grok. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Research nothing using grok. Canada has forest managers, and >>>>>>>>> you can >>>>>>>>> bet that they do what they can. The certainly don't need us >>>>>>>>> telling >>>>>>>>> them how to do their job. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That being said, no analysis of Canadian forest management can >>>>>>>> compare >>>>>>>> to the great analysis by Nick, who is now an expert in just about >>>>>>>> everything, especially fire science and wildfire prevention. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> lol. Good one >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> if dud had an actual critique on the argument he wouldn't be have >>>>>> to engaging in a _bear_ origin fallacy >>>>>> >>>>> You came here to learn fire science and forest management? >>>> >>>> you came HERE to be enlightened??? >>>> >>> So, what are you doing? >>> >>> Apparently Nick doesn't even have home solar. He's probably using way >>> too much energy cooling his crib with an electric heat pump. >>> >>> At least Nick and Noah could set an example. YMMV. >> >> you came HERE to get eNlIgHtEnEd??? >> > Let's not be hypocritical! You and Noah could do something to help save > the planet. Do nothing, do nothing, deny deny. let me ask again: you came HERE to get eNlIgHtEnEd??? -- why are we god? let's end war 🙃