Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...

On 8/2/26 7:58 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 7/31/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 7/31/26 3:16 PM, Creon wrote:
>>> At Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:14:40 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/31/2026 1:53 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 7/30/26 9:25 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:43:53 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 6:53 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/30/26 6:44 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:42:44 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:47:37 +0000, Creon <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:02:12 -0700, Dude <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Post your opinion here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fine, I shall:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think there is too much "baseline fallacy" in the economics
>>>>>>>>>>> discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And, I think the idea that the wealthy buy politicians is
>>>>>>>>>>> a bit trite.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And the reason certain ideas become trite is...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> $ dict trite
>>>>>>>>> 2 definitions found
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English 
>>>>>>>>> v.0.48
>>>>>>>>> [gcide]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      Trite \Trite\ (tr[imac]t), a. [L. tritus, p. p. of terere to
>>>>>>>>>         rub, to wear out; probably akin to E. throw. See 
>>>>>>>>> {Throw}, and
>>>>>>>>>         cf. {Contrite}, {Detriment}, {Tribulation}, {Try}.]
>>>>>>>>>         Worn out; common; used until so common as to have lost
>>>>>>>>>         novelty and interest; hackneyed; stale; as, a trite 
>>>>>>>>> remark; a
>>>>>>>>>         trite subject. -- {Trite"ly}, adv. -- {Trite"ness}, n.
>>>>>>>>>         [1913 Webster]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      trite
>>>>>>>>>          adj 1: repeated too often; overfamiliar through overuse;
>>>>>>>>>                 "bromidic sermons"; "his remarks were trite and
>>>>>>>>>                 commonplace"; "hackneyed phrases"; "a stock 
>>>>>>>>> answer";
>>>>>>>>>                 "repeating threadbare jokes"; "parroting some 
>>>>>>>>> timeworn
>>>>>>>>>                 axiom"; "the trite metaphor `hard as nails'" [syn:
>>>>>>>>>                 {banal}, {commonplace}, {hackneyed}, {old-hat},
>>>>>>>>>                 {shopworn}, {stock(a)}, {threadbare}, {timeworn},
>>>>>>>>>                 {tired}, {trite}, {well-worn}]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...and have I introduced you to the "panopticon" theory of media
>>>>>>>>> dynamics?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Media doesn't report what everyone thinks, it reports what it 
>>>>>>>>> wants
>>>>>>>>> everyone to think everyone thinks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Political corruption is a problem, but implying that _all_
>>>>>>>>> wealthy people are part of that is...a baseline fallacy.
>>>>>>>> seriously this group is literally just noah + a bunch of 
>>>>>>>> retarded cons
>>>>>>>> with their heads stuck up their butts, eh???
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it's statistically provable that public opinion does _not_ 
>>>>>>>> influence
>>>>>>>> federal policy, and that only the opinion of the wealthy matters 
>>>>>>>> in us
>>>>>>>> federal policy. they do this by surveying groups of people, 
>>>>>>>> segmenting
>>>>>>>> them by wealth class, and comparing that to the result of public
>>>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>>>> it's not a hard analysis.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in order to claim the /baserate/ fallacy u need some stats to 
>>>>>>>> back that
>>>>>>>> up, claiming it out of the blue is just a _bear_ assertion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That should be a wrap!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.  Specifically, fishrap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (It's used to attract the _bear_s, I guess?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dart200 is confused, that's not what the baseline fallacy
>>>>>> is.  The baseline fallacy is assuming "all" for "many", because
>>>>>> the large majority of a group form a "baseline" that is then
>>>>>> used to pigeonhole the whole group.
>>>>>
>>>>> nigga are you going to respond with anything useful?
>>>>>
>>>> The base line on this board is that the claim you are referring to is
>>>> entirely false and fabricated, originating from a mashup of internet
>>>> rumors and memes made up by informants which have all been refuted and
>>>> found to be spurious, crude racist and biased - on this very board!
>>>>
>>>> Don't make us go back there, Nick. It won't be easy on your ego. You
>>>> came here to get enlightened.
>>>>
>>>> You came to a bowling alley. Now You're our Bitch.
>>>>   >
>>>>   >
>>>>>    > or just keep proving wealth turns _all_ into retarded children???
>>>>>    >
>>>>>    > #god
>>>>>
>>>>> cause that's just a true generalization ... not a fallacy
>>>>>
>>>>> and i believe we'll prove it true when build transparent systems
>>>>>
>>>>>    > 🖕🤣🖕
>>>>>    >
>>>>>    > #god
>>>>>
>>>> The base rate fallacy (often called a baseline fallacy) is a thinking
>>>> error where you ignore general statistical facts (the "base rate") and
>>>> focus only on small, specific details or a single story
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I'm sure Nick knew all that.  That's what I like about him:
>>>>>> his attention to detail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My biz partner has met with the FCC, along
>>>>>>>>>>> with other representatives from regional ISPs that he
>>>>>>>>>>> picked up along the way.  Can't afford lobbiests?  Lobby 
>>>>>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Someday I'll have to tell you our "coopetition" story.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: The opinions expressed by informants are their own and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> do not
>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily represent the views of all Usenet board 
>>>>>>>>>>>> subscribers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I would really rather not see the mental midget quoted
>>> if he's going to throw tantrums.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, it will be off to the cornfield for you, too. ;)
>>>
>>
>> imagine being such a goddamn pussy ur gunna threaten to block others 
>> if they don't abide by ur blocklist
>>
>>   > humanity never ceases to reach for new kinds of low
>>   >
>>   > #god
>>
> Imagine being such a goddamn pussy you're going to pretend to be the 
> rich guy in a chat room. Compared to your current situation, all the 
> subscribers posting here are living on Easy Street.
> 
> What happened?

idk what ur talking i've been very upfront about my financial situation, 
moreso than anyone else here...

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃