Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/10/26 12:13 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 8/9/2026 5:56 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/9/26 3:43 PM, Dude wrote:
>>> On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconstruct temps over
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have been 
>>>>>>>>>>>> talking
>>>>>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see 
>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view below 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the big
>>>>>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest 
>>>>>>>>>>> estimated
>>>>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric 
>>>>>>>>>> climb. You
>>>>>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are you 
>>>>>>>>>> still in
>>>>>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. 
>>>>>>>>> Some will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as 
>>>>>>>>> high yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic reconstruction 
>>>>>>>> so what do u even know, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using 
>>>>>>> proxies, but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't 
>>>>>> trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
>>>>>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what 
>>>>>> you've been doing
>>>>>
>>>>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That 
>>>>> doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
>>>> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which 
>>>> does support your position ...
>>>>
>>>> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
>>>> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data 
>>>> points in support of it
>>>>
>>>> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, ideologues 
>>>> do be like that
>>>>
>>> Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by consensus:
>>>
>>> All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing about 
>>> wildfires.
>>>
>>
>> glad to see ur starting to admit ur absolute ignorance dud
>>
> So, you're idea is to clean up brush in the boreal forest?

my idea is that it's too labor/energy intensive to so do and therefore 
the forests will mostly burn down

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃