Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/9/2026 5:56 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/9/26 3:43 PM, Dude wrote:
>> On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to reconstruct 
>>>>>>>>>>>> temps over
>>>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that seems 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have been 
>>>>>>>>>>> talking
>>>>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see 
>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view below 
>>>>>>>>>>> the big
>>>>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest 
>>>>>>>>>> estimated
>>>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric climb. 
>>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are you 
>>>>>>>>> still in
>>>>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. Some 
>>>>>>>> will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as high yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic reconstruction 
>>>>>>> so what do u even know, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using proxies, 
>>>>>> but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't 
>>>>> trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>>>>
>>>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
>>>>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>>>>
>>>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what you've 
>>>>> been doing
>>>>
>>>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That 
>>>> doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
>>> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which 
>>> does support your position ...
>>>
>>> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
>>> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data 
>>> points in support of it
>>>
>>> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, ideologues 
>>> do be like that
>>>
>> Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by consensus:
>>
>> All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing about 
>> wildfires.
>>
> 
> glad to see ur starting to admit ur absolute ignorance dud
> 
So, you're idea is to clean up brush in the boreal forest?