Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/12/2026 5:35 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:29:00 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> On 8/11/2026 4:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/11/26 10:31 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>> America's Newspaper of Record:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The
>>>>>>> media love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with
>>>>>>> record low amounts of drought."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hot Air:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
>>>>>>
>>>>> The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
>>>>
>>>> Whoa, whoa, whoa there my dude. You can't go around asking questions
>>>> that require answers when the post you're responding to is simply an
>>>> attempt to discredit by association. The actual facts in question are
>>>> beside the point.
>>>
>>> global droughts have not increased, that is correct. but this also does
>>> not matter because droughts are a local climate issue, not a global one,
>>> and they have increased in places where it matter substantially
>>>
>>> pointing out the fact that droughts haven't increased globally does not
>>> change the crisis that does exist where they have. idk why i'm
>>> explaining this because ur so attached to ur ungodly ideology you are
>>> engaged in active denial of any and all associated crisis
>>
>> Worry less about the ideologically driven opinions of others and more
>> about your own.
> 
> Ha, you wish.  Once again you want to poopoo love's assertion that
> *you* specifically are limited by your ideological commitments.  Love
> was right about that.  Not that others might not share some of that
> tendency.  But that you especially do.
> 
> And not that the effect of such commitments have not had deleterious
> effects on society generally in the past 10 years.  Of course the
> problem is much older than that, but only recently has its influence
> been having serious consequences.

I and my ideology are personally responsible for those (unnamed) 
deleterious effects on society?  Serious consequences!

No doubt your henchpeople will have to deal strongly with me when the 
time comes.