Re: Global Warming Alert

At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:01:36 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
> > On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >> On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>> On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>> On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And 
> >>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. I've been wrong about something.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. You don't agree with me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nice try asshole.
> >>>>
> >>>> No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look 
> >>>> tougher.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state 
> >>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However,
> >>>>> lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
> >>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
> >>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
> >>>>> you do not.  I am not inclined to be forgiving.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
> >>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing 
> >>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
> >>>>
> >>>> If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better, 
> >>>> that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it 
> >>>> can't be deliberate.
> >>>
> >>> nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs 
> >>> reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred 
> >>> narrative ...
> >>
> >> Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what 
> >> makes sense.  Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
> > 
> > my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of 
> > evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur 
> > stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
> > 
> >> Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
> > 
> > it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to 
> > take responsibility for the godshit u preach
> > 
> 
> You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than 
> regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults & 
> semi-delusional rants.

He seems full-on delusional.

Earlier he was talking about "ownership of the means of healthcare
production".  Um.......wat?

-- 
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
   OS: Linux 7.2.0-rc7 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
   NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04)
   "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong."