Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And 
>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. I've been wrong about something.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. You don't agree with me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nice try asshole.
>>>>>
>>>>> No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look 
>>>>> tougher.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state 
>>>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However,
>>>>>> lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
>>>>>> you do not.  I am not inclined to be forgiving.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. 
>>>>>> You
>>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing 
>>>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better, 
>>>>> that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it 
>>>>> can't be deliberate.
>>>>
>>>> nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs 
>>>> reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred 
>>>> narrative ...
>>>
>>> Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding 
>>> what makes sense.  Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
>>
>> my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of 
>> evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur 
>> stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
>>
>>> Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
>>
>> it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to 
>> take responsibility for the godshit u preach
>>
> 
> You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than 
> regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults & 
> semi-delusional rants.
> 

you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u 
dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not believe 
than, and such reason has not been provided ...

ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to do 
that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was 
disgustingly pathetic

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃