Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...
Creon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Unnamed Newswriter |
| Message-ID | <R8ogS.39435$G%[email protected]> |
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:02:49 -0700, dart200 <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote: > > On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote: > >> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 8/14/26 9:38 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 8/13/2026 8:49 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/26 1:52 PM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Do you even ever think about the reality that guns are in > >>>>>>>>>>> fact property? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> gun ownership is very much not zero-sum, unlike the kinds of > >>>>>>>>>> property ownership that can then interfere with the freedoms > >>>>>>>>>> of others > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Your belief system is a bundle of contradictions. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> u don't have something worthy of being called "a belief > >>>>>>>>>> system", as it's not established upon principles that u > >>>>>>>>>> actually uphold generally > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So you see guns as being a special kind of property. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What if someone can't afford a gun? In that case it's pretty > >>>>>>>>> clear your ethics would require you to redistribute partial > >>>>>>>>> ownership of your gun to him. He can't afford to get one of his > >>>>>>>>> own so you need to share. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You should be glad to do it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think we > >>>>>>>> should actively train and arm the population (to some high > >>>>>>>> percentage). and i think we should do so on the taxpayers dime > >>>>>>>> because it's advantageous for the preservation of liberty, to > >>>>>>>> have a distributed the common defense against tyranny. we have > >>>>>>>> than enough gun production to achieve this > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that training? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military already dud > >>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that will > >>>>> stop the government if they get too despotic and authoritarian. > >>>> > >>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt even has > >>>> the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect having each state > >>>> funding their own militia to be a robust enough protection against > >>>> federal tyranny > >>> > >>> Okay. Good luck with that. > >>> > >> > >> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the fucking > >> retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive liability that are > >> gun rights > >> > >> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker > >> > > > > No one cares about your evil fantasies. > > > > YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL MOTHERFUCKER https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RulesOfTheInternet Rule 39: CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL. Rule 40: EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER A simple syllogism: 1) Self-defense is a human right. 2) Bad guys have deadly weapons. Therefore: 3) Good guys also have deadly weapons. Because out at the ranch: When seconds count, the sheriff is minutes away. -- -c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G OS: Linux 7.2.0-rc7 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04) "Police Blotter: Energizer Bunny Charged with Battery!"