Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/16/2026 3:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/16/26 11:58 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/16/2026 2:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And 
>>>>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. I've been wrong about something.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2. You don't agree with me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nice try asshole.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look 
>>>>>>>> tougher.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely 
>>>>>>>>>> state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However,
>>>>>>>>> lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or 
>>>>>>>>> innocent.
>>>>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
>>>>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know 
>>>>>>>>> better, but
>>>>>>>>> you do not.  I am not inclined to be forgiving.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even if love says you are limited by your ideological 
>>>>>>>>> commitments. You
>>>>>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and 
>>>>>>>> passing judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know 
>>>>>>>> better, that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart 
>>>>>>>> enough, it can't be deliberate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence 
>>>>>>> vs reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred 
>>>>>>> narrative ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding 
>>>>>> what makes sense.  Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of 
>>>>> evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur 
>>>>> stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing 
>>>>> to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather 
>>>> than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual 
>>>> insults & semi-delusional rants.
>>>>
>>>
>>> you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u 
>>> dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not 
>>> believe than, and such reason has not been provided ...
>>>
>>> ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to do 
>>> that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was 
>>> disgustingly pathetic
>>>
>>
>> You called some of the papers I did cite bogus, and couldn't even 
>> follow the logic of why I interpreted one the way I did. As it's 
>> apparently beyond you, why should I bother?
>>
> 
> u can't even cite the papers correct u dumbass
> 
> u literally tried to pass off a simulation attemp that the paper itself 
> stated as obviously incomplete... as an actual hard paleoclimatic 
> reconstruction
> 
> u don't even know what evidence even is ur so damn negligently caught up 
> in ideological bullcrap
> 

Nick: "blah, blah, blah, everyone who's not me is stupid..."