Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...

On 8/16/2026 6:24 PM, Creon wrote:
> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:57:48 -0700, dart200
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/16/26 12:25 PM, Creon wrote:
>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:02:49 -0700, dart200
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/26 9:38 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/2026 8:49 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/26 1:52 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even ever think about the reality that guns are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in fact property?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gun ownership is very much not zero-sum, unlike the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kinds of property ownership that can then interfere with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the freedoms of others
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your belief system is a bundle of contradictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u don't have something worthy of being called "a belief
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system", as it's not established upon principles that u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually uphold generally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you see guns as being a special kind of property.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What if someone can't afford a gun? In that case it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty clear your ethics would require you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> redistribute partial ownership of your gun to him. He
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't afford to get one of his own so you need to share.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should be glad to do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think
>>>>>>>>>>>> we should actively train and arm the population (to some
>>>>>>>>>>>> high percentage). and i think we should do so on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayers dime because it's advantageous for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> preservation of liberty, to have a distributed the common
>>>>>>>>>>>> defense against tyranny. we have than enough gun
>>>>>>>>>>>> production to achieve this
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that
>>>>>>>>>>> training?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military already
>>>>>>>>>> dud
>>>>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that
>>>>>>>>> will stop the government if they get too despotic and
>>>>>>>>> authoritarian.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt even
>>>>>>>> has the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect having
>>>>>>>> each state funding their own militia to be a robust enough
>>>>>>>> protection against federal tyranny
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Okay. Good luck with that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the
>>>>>> fucking retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive
>>>>>> liability that are gun rights
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No one cares about your evil fantasies.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL
>>>> MOTHERFUCKER
>>>
>>> https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RulesOfTheInternet
>>>
>>> Rule 39: CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL.
>>> Rule 40: EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER
>>>
>>> A simple syllogism:
>>>
>>> 1) Self-defense is a human right.
>>> 2) Bad guys have deadly weapons.
>>> Therefore:
>>> 3) Good guys also have deadly weapons.
>>>
>>> Because out at the ranch:  When seconds count, the sheriff is
>>> minutes away.
>>>
>>
>> moronic arguments like this are why u lump you in with the rest of the
>> cons festering in the shitshow of ignorance that is this group
> 
> Since you have no counter to my argument, you attempt a blatant
> ad hominem logical fallacy.
> 
> Study logic.  Please.  If not for your sake, then for posterity's
> sake -- you're embarrassing yourself, and future descendants.
> 
He came here t get enlightened.