Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...

On 8/17/2026 12:31 AM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/16/26 11:33 PM, Creon wrote:
>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:24:45 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/26 12:29 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we should actively train and arm the population (to some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high percentage). and i think we should do so on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayers dime because it's advantageous for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preservation of liberty, to have a distributed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common defense against tyranny. we have than enough gun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> production to achieve this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> training?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already dud
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that
>>>>>>>>>>>> will stop the government if they get too despotic and
>>>>>>>>>>>> authoritarian.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt
>>>>>>>>>>> even has the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect
>>>>>>>>>>> having each state funding their own militia to be a robust
>>>>>>>>>>> enough protection against federal tyranny
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Okay. Good luck with that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the
>>>>>>>>> fucking retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive
>>>>>>>>> liability that are gun rights
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No one cares about your evil fantasies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL
>>>>>>> MOTHERFUCKER
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I dont care about your evil fantasies.
>>>>>
>>>>> the guns deaths in country are far from fantasies u evil denialist
>>>>> fuck
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And you swallow the propaganda that it's law abiding people with
>>>> guns who are causing that death?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> If the bad guys didn’t have access to guns, the law abiding people
>>> wouldn’t need guns to protect them from the bad guys.
>>
>> So a bad guy attacks with a knife instead.  What does Mother Jones
>> use to defend herself?
> 
> wow ur actually that fucking dumb creon???
> 
> the liability from having bad guys with guns far out classes the safety 
> you get from having guns to defend against knife attacks, and the stats 
> speak for themselves across many countries
> 
> i'm not anti gun rights entirely mind you. i understand why they exist, 
> and i support them _in spite of_ the liability they present to personal 
> safety within society ...
> 
> but man u fucks are morons. like zero personal progression eh? year 2026 
> and people are still arguing fact-denying propaganda like that?
> 
> can i actually get some enlightenment up in this bitch dud or is it 
> really gunna be _this_ much of a slog???
> 
In the US You have a constitutional right to bear arms for self defense. 
The question is: are you a free citizen?