Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...
Tara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 17, 2026 at 3:44:59 PM EDT, "Dude" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/17/2026 11:44 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:24:47 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8/17/2026 12:31 AM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 8/16/26 11:33 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:24:45 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 12:29 PM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:02 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we should actively train and arm the population (to some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high percentage). and i think we should do so on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayers dime because it's advantageous for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preservation of liberty, to have a distributed the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common defense against tyranny. we have than enough gun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> production to achieve this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> training? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already dud >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will stop the government if they get too despotic and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authoritarian. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even has the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect >>>>>>>>>>>>>> having each state funding their own militia to be a robust >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough protection against federal tyranny >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay. Good luck with that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the >>>>>>>>>>>> fucking retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive >>>>>>>>>>>> liability that are gun rights >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No one cares about your evil fantasies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL >>>>>>>>>> MOTHERFUCKER >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I dont care about your evil fantasies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the guns deaths in country are far from fantasies u evil denialist >>>>>>>> fuck >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you swallow the propaganda that it's law abiding people with >>>>>>> guns who are causing that death? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If the bad guys didn’t have access to guns, the law abiding people >>>>>> wouldn’t need guns to protect them from the bad guys. >>>>> >>>>> So a bad guy attacks with a knife instead. What does Mother Jones >>>>> use to defend herself? >>>> >>>> wow ur actually that fucking dumb creon??? >>>> >>>> the liability from having bad guys with guns far out classes the safety >>>> you get from having guns to defend against knife attacks, and the stats >>>> speak for themselves across many countries >>>> >>>> i'm not anti gun rights entirely mind you. i understand why they exist, >>>> and i support them _in spite of_ the liability they present to personal >>>> safety within society ... >>>> >>>> but man u fucks are morons. like zero personal progression eh? year 2026 >>>> and people are still arguing fact-denying propaganda like that? >>>> >>>> can i actually get some enlightenment up in this bitch dud or is it >>>> really gunna be _this_ much of a slog??? >>>> >>> In the US You have a constitutional right to bear arms for self defense. >>> The question is: are you a free citizen? >> >> The question is, are you dumb enough to think you need to walk around >> with a gun? > >> > The question is, even without a gun, why would anyone walk around > defenseless? If they live in a country where walking around is dangerous, then I suppose they would need a defence. My mom and dad had a beach house in the florida pan-handle for years. I was there a few times and everything seemed calm, safe and peaceful. On the surface. For the first season, my parents were astonished when they were advised not to go out at night because it was too dangerous. And everyone had to lock their doors when they were out (even for a walk on the beach) in the daytime. Neighbours on both sides were burgled - during the day! They loved it there but were always grateful to come home and feel safe. (my mom's words not mine) So yeah, I get it that you need defence.