Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/17/2026 2:00 PM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's 
>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly 
>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and 
>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic 
>>>>>> freedom on this planet
>>>>>>
>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
>>>>
>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been 
>>>> prosperous enough
>>>>
>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 
>>>> 7/8 of the total global population because capitalism needs to 
>>>> maintain it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
>>>>
>>>>   > you people are fucking psychos tbh
>>>>   >
>>>>   > #god
>>>>
>>>
>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>>>
>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who 
>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their 
>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in 
>>> with the 
>>
>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they 
>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u 
>> fucking racist tard
>>
>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would) 
>>> destroy their nation.
>>
>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5% 
>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our 
>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to 
>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people 
>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>
>>>
>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents 
>>> who are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>
>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this 
>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" 
>> you inhumane prick
>>
>>>
>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be 
>>> destroyed.
>>>
>>
>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic 
>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a 
>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>
> 
> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would 
> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
> 
> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin 
> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
> 
It's starting to look we've got a couple of wise guys here, twisting 
simple logic into it's opposite.  Clever. 5th grade level debate.