Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...

On 8/17/2026 12:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/17/26 10:24 AM, Dude wrote:
>> On 8/17/2026 12:31 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/16/26 11:33 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:24:45 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 12:29 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we should actively train and arm the population (to some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high percentage). and i think we should do so on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayers dime because it's advantageous for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preservation of liberty, to have a distributed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> common defense against tyranny. we have than enough gun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> production to achieve this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> training?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already dud
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will stop the government if they get too despotic and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> authoritarian.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even has the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect
>>>>>>>>>>>>> having each state funding their own militia to be a robust
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough protection against federal tyranny
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay. Good luck with that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the
>>>>>>>>>>> fucking retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive
>>>>>>>>>>> liability that are gun rights
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No one cares about your evil fantasies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL
>>>>>>>>> MOTHERFUCKER
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I dont care about your evil fantasies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the guns deaths in country are far from fantasies u evil denialist
>>>>>>> fuck
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you swallow the propaganda that it's law abiding people with
>>>>>> guns who are causing that death?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the bad guys didn’t have access to guns, the law abiding people
>>>>> wouldn’t need guns to protect them from the bad guys.
>>>>
>>>> So a bad guy attacks with a knife instead.  What does Mother Jones
>>>> use to defend herself?
>>>
>>> wow ur actually that fucking dumb creon???
>>>
>>> the liability from having bad guys with guns far out classes the 
>>> safety you get from having guns to defend against knife attacks, and 
>>> the stats speak for themselves across many countries
>>>
>>> i'm not anti gun rights entirely mind you. i understand why they 
>>> exist, and i support them _in spite of_ the liability they present to 
>>> personal safety within society ...
>>>
>>> but man u fucks are morons. like zero personal progression eh? year 
>>> 2026 and people are still arguing fact-denying propaganda like that?
>>>
>>> can i actually get some enlightenment up in this bitch dud or is it 
>>> really gunna be _this_ much of a slog???
>>>
>> In the US You have a constitutional right to bear arms for self 
>> defense. The question is: are you a free citizen?
> 
> this question is:
> 
> where's that fucking eNlIgHteNmEnT ur keep bleating on and on about???
> 
You came here for enlightenment?