Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:28:33 -0700, dart200
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 8/18/26 5:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
>>>>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
>>>>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
>>>>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
>>>>>>>>> freedom on this planet
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been
>>>>>>> prosperous enough
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8
>>>>>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain
>>>>>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    > you people are fucking psychos tbh
>>>>>>>    >
>>>>>>>    > #god
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>>>>>> with the
>>>>>
>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>
>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>
>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>
>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>>
>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
>> 
>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>> 
>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>> 
>
>creon is correct about that ad absurdum is a valid argument style, the 
>term noah was looking for is slippery slope fallacy

Not so.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away